2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.12.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron–methane interaction model for the energy range 0.1–10000eV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated intrinsic numerical uncertainty of the present method is within 10%. 12,13 Note that our SCAR method has been shown on numerous occasions to be a powerful tool to calculate electron scattering cross sections, for a large variety of molecules, [37][38][39] from intermediate up to high energies.…”
Section: Theoretical Method: the Iam-scar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The estimated intrinsic numerical uncertainty of the present method is within 10%. 12,13 Note that our SCAR method has been shown on numerous occasions to be a powerful tool to calculate electron scattering cross sections, for a large variety of molecules, [37][38][39] from intermediate up to high energies.…”
Section: Theoretical Method: the Iam-scar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] Additionally, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms governing the DNA damage induced by electron collisions requires a broader knowledge of the scattering dynamics of these electrons with the constituent DNA compounds, such as the nucleobases. It is customary to employ model molecules, with simpler geometries and physicochemical properties, as this simplifies both the experimental and theoretical investigations and provides valuable information on the scattering nature and interaction probabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments of Monte Carlo-based empirical simulations on pseudo-physiological environment allow us to model electron (and positron) tracks that result from the interaction of high energy quanta through a given tissue-equivalent material (TEM). [3][4][5][6][7] At the moment, however, the simulations are restricted to rather simplistic TEMs, [6][7][8] owing to the empirical nature of these models requiring information on the cross sections and dynamics of the underlying physicochemical processes. Therefore, the study of fundamental molecular mechanisms is of particular relevance to allow for these models to encompass increasingly (and therefore more accurate) descriptions of the physiological environment's response to radiation-induced changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, an uncertainty of about 10% on the elastic DCSs is good enough to apply those data in the Monte Carlo simulations used to estimate energy deposition in the medium upon high-energy radiation. 48 Nevertheless, the present study reveals that, although the contribution of vibrationally inelastic processes strongly decreases with increasing incident energy at small scattering angles, as usually assumed, this contribution could increase to even above 10% at high scattering angles where the elastic DCSs attain small values. Therefore, it cannot be considered negligible if a highly precise study is needed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%