1980
DOI: 10.1038/ki.1980.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron microprobe analysis of intracellular elements in the rat kidney

Abstract: The concentrations of intracellular elements were determined by electron microprobe analysis in the nucleus and cytoplasm of freeze-dried cryosections of superficial proximal and distal tubules of the rat kidney. For the nucleus of the proximal tubular cell, the concentrations of sodium and chloride were 20 and 23 mmoles/kg of wet wt, and those of potassium and phosphorus were 144 and 150 mmoles/kg wet wt. For the nucleus of the distal tubular cell, the concentrations of sodium and chloride were significanlty … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With electron microprobe analysis, maturating chick red blood cells (18 day, near hatching) had N͞C ratios ϭ 0. 48 (44); for rat renal tubular cells, the N͞C ratios for Cl Ϫ and Na ϩ varied somewhat depending on the cytoplasmic region analyzed (45,46); and in rat hepatocytes, where N͞C ϭ 0.9 for Cl Ϫ and 1.1 for Na ϩ (47). It is evident that in all of these studies, there are only small variations in N͞C values for Cl Ϫ and Na ϩ .…”
Section: CLmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…With electron microprobe analysis, maturating chick red blood cells (18 day, near hatching) had N͞C ratios ϭ 0. 48 (44); for rat renal tubular cells, the N͞C ratios for Cl Ϫ and Na ϩ varied somewhat depending on the cytoplasmic region analyzed (45,46); and in rat hepatocytes, where N͞C ϭ 0.9 for Cl Ϫ and 1.1 for Na ϩ (47). It is evident that in all of these studies, there are only small variations in N͞C values for Cl Ϫ and Na ϩ .…”
Section: CLmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Small areas (1–2 µm 2 ) were scanned for 100 s and the emitted X-rays analyzed in the energy range of 0.2–20 keV. Measurements were restricted to the cell nucleus in order to avoid ‘contamination’ by basolateral infoldings and apical vesicles with electrolyte concentrations differing from cyto- and nucleosol [14, 15]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resting membrane potential of the rabbit proximal tubule depolarizes transiently, from a resting value of around Ϫ40 to Ϫ25 mV on exposure to the Na ϩ -cotransported substrate alanine (15). Thus the basolateral membrane potential and intracellular Na ϩ , at least in rabbit proximal tubule, enter the range where channel block may be apparent; using the above "worst-case" values; i.e., at an intracellular Na ϩ of 62 mM and voltage of Ϫ25 mV, one would predict, using the Woodhull equation, a 21% block of TASK2 currents by intracellular Na ϩ ; if the Na concentration were lower, e.g., 20 mM as in the rat (2,34), this inhibition would be reduced to 9%. Certainly, before washout in the CHO cells used in the current study, rectification was apparent at almost all potentials positive to the reversal potential (Fig.…”
Section: Namentioning
confidence: 99%