1984
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90190-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron microscopy can be used to measure DNA supertwisting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5B yielded a value of 15 Ϯ 3 per 1-kb minicircle. In a previous study of molecules of superhelical density in the range of Ϫ0.07, the number of crossovers detected by EM roughly equals the number of supertwists (36). This relationship is not established for highly twisted molecules like fraction S minicircles, and therefore, we can conclude only that supertwisting is extreme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…5B yielded a value of 15 Ϯ 3 per 1-kb minicircle. In a previous study of molecules of superhelical density in the range of Ϫ0.07, the number of crossovers detected by EM roughly equals the number of supertwists (36). This relationship is not established for highly twisted molecules like fraction S minicircles, and therefore, we can conclude only that supertwisting is extreme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We assume the number of supercoils in the liquid crystalline state to be about the same as that observed in electrophoresis. Support for this assumption is drawn from electron microscopy which has shown that the number of supertwists seen corresponds to the values obtained from gels (Sperrazza et al, 1984). We thus calculate 1 = 630 + 30A (i.e.…”
Section: Structural Parameters Of Supercoils In Liquid Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Previous work on the shape of supercoiled doublestranded (ds) DNA in solution has led to controversial interpretations which have supported both a toroidal (Brady et al, 1976, Brady et al, 1987 and an interwound model of DNA supercoiling (Langowski, 1987;Torbet and DiCapua, 1989). Most electron microscopy data favor the interwound model (Rhoades and Thomas, 1968;Sperrazza et al, 1984;Boles et al, 1990). However, these routine electron microscopy preparation procedures can be misleading; it cannot be ruled out that supercoiled DNA molecules undergo a transition from a toroidal to an interwound form as a result of the adsorption and drying on the supporting film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%