2005
DOI: 10.1080/01913120500323399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Microscopy in the Diagnosis of BK-Polyoma Virus Infection in the Transplanted Kidney

Abstract: BK polyomavirus has become an important etiologic agent responsible for significant morbidity in renal transplant recipients. This virus can be detected in transitional cells in the urine (decoy cells) using cytology, but correlation with allograft function status and histologic evidence of renal involvement is poor. Accurate diagnosis of BK polyomavirus infection requires a high index of suspicion and utilization of ancillary diagnostic techniques in many cases. Electron microscopy is very sensitive in depict… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific antibody to BK virus is fraud with a high background in tissue sections, making accurate interpretation quite difficult to impossible in some instances. In contrast, the anti SV-40 antibody is much cleaner, has been shown to cross-react with BK virus antigenic determinants, and is, therefore, a better way to diagnose the presence of the BK virus in tissue, although sensitivity may be an issue with this immunohistochemical stain [28]. Studies addressing the differences in sensitivity, if any, between different immunohistochemical stains to detect BK virus (i.e., using specific anti KB virus vs. anti-SV-40 antibodies) have not been performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The specific antibody to BK virus is fraud with a high background in tissue sections, making accurate interpretation quite difficult to impossible in some instances. In contrast, the anti SV-40 antibody is much cleaner, has been shown to cross-react with BK virus antigenic determinants, and is, therefore, a better way to diagnose the presence of the BK virus in tissue, although sensitivity may be an issue with this immunohistochemical stain [28]. Studies addressing the differences in sensitivity, if any, between different immunohistochemical stains to detect BK virus (i.e., using specific anti KB virus vs. anti-SV-40 antibodies) have not been performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The diameter was less than the conventional diameter for polyomaviruses (45 nm), but the size of viral particles can vary according to the method of fixation and embedding (14). In addition, previously published electron microscopy findings for BKPyV particles indicated measurements of 30-50 nm (15). Despite the presence of viral particles indicative of polyomavirus, IHC on lung tissue with a primary antibody against simian virus 40, which is known to cross-react with BK and JC polyomaviruses, was negative.…”
Section: Complete Genome Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…14B) with smudgy chromatin, nuclear atypia, and anisocytosis, progressing to detachment and apoptosis or necrosis of the epithelial cells. 64,65 These histologic changes can be focal and a ''negative'' biopsy does not rule out BKN. 59 The inclusions can be highlighted by immunoperoxidase staining with antibody for the large T antigen of SV40 virus.…”
Section: Viral Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%