2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.physc.2011.05.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron microscopy observations of MgB2 wire prepared by an internal Mg diffusion method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A high density of unreacted B particles was observed at an area far from the hole in figure 3(a), which can be explained by the long Mg diffusion distance from the center of the wire. This result is consistent with the results of Shimada et al [26]. Unreacted B particles in the Mg-added wires in figure 3(b) can be explained by the fact that the starting B powders contained some large particles and these were not easily crushed using a mortar in the lab.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A high density of unreacted B particles was observed at an area far from the hole in figure 3(a), which can be explained by the long Mg diffusion distance from the center of the wire. This result is consistent with the results of Shimada et al [26]. Unreacted B particles in the Mg-added wires in figure 3(b) can be explained by the fact that the starting B powders contained some large particles and these were not easily crushed using a mortar in the lab.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the larger diameter wires some of the B remains unreacted even after -10-the longest HT. The same issue has also been reported by other researchers [23]. Of course, a high J e is favored by high layer-J c combined with a fully reacted superconducting core.…”
Section: Engineering Critical Current Density J E -9-supporting
confidence: 83%
“…The conductor is formed by Mg from the central rod diffusing into the surrounding B precursors in certain conditions and then reacting into a MgB 2 hollow cylinder. Whereas the PIT process produces a porous MgB 2 core, the IMD process provides a dense MgB 2 layer with excellent longitudinal and transverse connectivities [14][15][16]. To calculate the critical current densities of these IMD wires, it is important to take care with the definition of the areas to which the critical current, I c , is normalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%