Electron Microscopy Views of Dimorphic Chloroplasts in C4 Plants

Abstract

C4 plants enhance photosynthesis efficiency by concentrating CO 2 to the site of Rubisco action. Chloroplasts in C4 plants exhibit structural dimorphism because thylakoid architectures vary depending on energy requirements. Advances in electron microscopy imaging capacity and sample preparation technologies allowed characterization of thylakoid structures and their macromolecular arrangements with unprecedented precision mostly in C3 plants. The thylakoid is assembled during chloroplast biogenesis through collaboration between the plastid and nuclear genomes. Recently, the membrane dynamics involved in the assembly process has been investigated with 3D electron microscopy, and molecular factors required for thylakoid construction have been characterized. The two classes of chloroplasts in C4 plants arise from common precursors, but little is known about how a single type of chloroplasts grow, divide, and differentiate to mature into distinct chloroplasts. Here, we outline the thylakoid structure and its assembly processes in C3 plants to discuss ultrastructural analyses of dimorphic chloroplast biogenesis in C4 plant species. Future directions for electron microscopy research of C4 photosynthetic systems are also proposed.

Friendly mediates membrane depolarization-induced mitophagy in Arabidopsis

“…Upon light exposure, seedlings undergo deetiolation, which involves transformation of etioplasts into chloroplasts. 30 Because mitochondrial and chloroplast functions are interlinked, 31 we hypothesized that the mitochondrial population might be adjusted during de-etiolation. First, we monitored the greening of cotyledons when dark-grown seedlings were illuminated with light.…”

Exploring 3D leaf anatomical traits for C4 photosynthesis: chloroplast and plasmodesmata pit field size in maize and sugarcane

“…This may result in poor or biased information; therefore, it is necessary to investigate the 3D geometry of chloroplasts, cells, and their components such as plasmodesmata for improving accuracy of values and understanding of a ‘global view’ (Théroux‐Rancourt et al ., 2017; Danila et al ., 2018; Harwood et al ., 2020). Because C 4 species often have dimorphic chloroplasts between bundle sheath and mesophyll cell types as well as variable plasmodesmata pit field density, as the functionality of the cells is different, it was important to view both bundle sheath and mesophyll traits (Edwards et al ., 2001; Mai et al ., 2020). Additionally, we compare chloroplast volume and surface area estimates in maize ( Zea mays ) and sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.…”

Accelerated remodeling of the mesophyll-bundle sheath interface in the maize C4 cycle mutant leaves

“…The M and BS chloroplasts of the maize have different energy requirements and have different ultrastructural features 9 , 10 . In the M chloroplast, both photosystem II (PSII) and photosystem I (PSI) mediate linear electron flow to produce ATP and NADPH.…”