2020
DOI: 10.3390/biom10050763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance as a Tool for Studying Membrane Proteins

Abstract: Membrane proteins possess a variety of functions essential to the survival of organisms. However, due to their inherent hydrophobic nature, it is extremely difficult to probe the structure and dynamic properties of membrane proteins using traditional biophysical techniques, particularly in their native environments. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy in combination with site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) is a very powerful and rapidly growing biophysical technique to study pertinent structural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
(339 reference statements)
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, great efforts have been made to develop technical and methodological improvements in structural biology approaches for studying membrane proteins. However, the challenges introduced in sample preparation of membrane proteins in suitable membrane environments and their complex behavior in lipid bilayer membrane environments severely limit the application of biophysical approaches for studying membrane proteins [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are the two most successful and widely utilized biophysical techniques for obtaining structural data on protein systems.…”
Section: Challenges and Recent Improvements Using Biophysical Techniqmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In recent years, great efforts have been made to develop technical and methodological improvements in structural biology approaches for studying membrane proteins. However, the challenges introduced in sample preparation of membrane proteins in suitable membrane environments and their complex behavior in lipid bilayer membrane environments severely limit the application of biophysical approaches for studying membrane proteins [35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. X-ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are the two most successful and widely utilized biophysical techniques for obtaining structural data on protein systems.…”
Section: Challenges and Recent Improvements Using Biophysical Techniqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CW-EPR spectroscopy of spin-labeled macromolecules can provide structural dynamics of nitroxide side-chain, solvent accessibility, solvent polarity, and intra-or intermolecular distances between two nitroxides [5,6,41,59,72,83]. The EPR spectral lineshape analysis of the series of spin-labeled protein sequences can be used to probe the secondary structural information of the protein systems [41,[84][85][86][87]. (B) Cartoon representation of the structure of MTSL and the resulting side-chain produced by reaction with a cysteine residue (L134C) and (C) the structure of BSL (bifunctional spin label) and the resulting side-chain produced by reaction with cysteine residues (L134C and I138C) on a KCNQ1-VSD membrane protein.…”
Section: Site Directed Spin Labeling (Sdsl) Approaches For Epr Spectrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Spectroscopic approaches are powerful tools for monitoring protein conformational dynamics that are not captured in static structures (Elvington and Maduke, 2008;McHaourab et al, 2011;Sekhar and Kay, 2019;Sahu and Lorigan, 2020). Single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) has emerged as an important player in the spectroscopic toolbox, as a method that can monitor conformational transitions in real time (Zhao et al, 2010;Landes et al, 2011;Akyuz et al, 2015;Dolino et al, 2015;Vafabakhsh et al, 2015;Juette et al, 2016;Dyla et al, 2017;Han et al, 2017;Lerner et al, 2018;Ren et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2018;de Boer et al, 2019;MacLean et al, 2019;Mazal and Haran, 2019;Zhu et al, 2019;Carrillo et al, 2020;Durham et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%