2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1919451117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron–phonon-driven three-dimensional metallicity in an insulating cuprate

Abstract: The role of the crystal lattice for the electronic properties of cuprates and other high-temperature superconductors remains controversial despite decades of theoretical and experimental efforts. While the paradigm of strong electronic correlations suggests a purely electronic mechanism behind the insulator-to-metal transition, recently the mutual enhancement of the electron-electron and the electron-phonon interaction and its relevance to the formation of the ordered phases have also been emphasized.Here, we … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the field has seen an evolution from the early measurements of transient absorption and reflectivity (Chemla and Shah, 2000;Elsayed-Ali et al, 1987;Koshihara et al, 1990;Miyano et al, 1997;Schoenlein et al, 1987;Tsen, 2001) into a multifaceted set of techniques, where the particular details of experiments depend on the targeted subsystem and dynamics (Averitt and Taylor, 2002;Orenstein, 2012). Some of the most advantageous capabilities of these approaches are: (i) direct detection of transient changes in the electronic joint density of states via frequency-resolved measurements of the transient complex optical conductivity from the THz to the extreme ultraviolet range (Baldini et al, 2020;Jager et al, 2017;Sie et al, 2015;Siegrist et al, 2019), (ii) simultaneous measurements of the dynamics of different subsystems by combining multiple detection schemes , including transient non-linear optical processes (Mahmood et al, 2021;Sala et al, 2016;Woerner et al, 2013) and polarization rotations sensitive to changes in magnetic orders (Beaurepaire et al, 1996;Kimel et al, 2020;Kirilyuk et al, 2010;Němec et al, 2018;Schlauderer et al, 2019;Walowski and Münzenberg, 2016), (iii) the integrability with other external stimuli, for example magnetic fields and hydrostatic pressure (Cantaluppi et al, 2018;Mitrano et al, 2014;Nicoletti et al, 2018;Trigo et al, 2012), and (iv) the ability to modulate and control the optical pulse to gain real-space information (Gedik et al, 2003;Mahmood et al, 2018;Torchinsky et al, 2014). These techniques have enabled the observation of a wide range of phenomena in the time domain including quasiparticle relaxation dynamics, electron-boson coupling strengths, gap magnitudes, photoexcited order parameters and collective mode oscillations …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the field has seen an evolution from the early measurements of transient absorption and reflectivity (Chemla and Shah, 2000;Elsayed-Ali et al, 1987;Koshihara et al, 1990;Miyano et al, 1997;Schoenlein et al, 1987;Tsen, 2001) into a multifaceted set of techniques, where the particular details of experiments depend on the targeted subsystem and dynamics (Averitt and Taylor, 2002;Orenstein, 2012). Some of the most advantageous capabilities of these approaches are: (i) direct detection of transient changes in the electronic joint density of states via frequency-resolved measurements of the transient complex optical conductivity from the THz to the extreme ultraviolet range (Baldini et al, 2020;Jager et al, 2017;Sie et al, 2015;Siegrist et al, 2019), (ii) simultaneous measurements of the dynamics of different subsystems by combining multiple detection schemes , including transient non-linear optical processes (Mahmood et al, 2021;Sala et al, 2016;Woerner et al, 2013) and polarization rotations sensitive to changes in magnetic orders (Beaurepaire et al, 1996;Kimel et al, 2020;Kirilyuk et al, 2010;Němec et al, 2018;Schlauderer et al, 2019;Walowski and Münzenberg, 2016), (iii) the integrability with other external stimuli, for example magnetic fields and hydrostatic pressure (Cantaluppi et al, 2018;Mitrano et al, 2014;Nicoletti et al, 2018;Trigo et al, 2012), and (iv) the ability to modulate and control the optical pulse to gain real-space information (Gedik et al, 2003;Mahmood et al, 2018;Torchinsky et al, 2014). These techniques have enabled the observation of a wide range of phenomena in the time domain including quasiparticle relaxation dynamics, electron-boson coupling strengths, gap magnitudes, photoexcited order parameters and collective mode oscillations …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superconductivity depends critically on the alignment of this state to the Fermi level. We are able to make these findings thanks to recent developments that couple (quasiparticle) self consistent GW (QSGW) with dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) [7][8][9][10]. Merging these two state-of-the-art methods captures the effect of both strong local dynamic spin fluctuations (captured well in DMFT), and nonlocal dynamic correlation [11,12] effects captured by QSGW [13].…”
Section: Controlling T C Through Band Structure and Correlation Engineering In Collapsed And Uncollapsed Phases Of Iron Arsenidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the one-particle Green's function it combines the quasiparticle self consistent GW (QSGW) approximation [13] with CTQMC solver [14,15] based dynamical mean field theory (DMFT) [16]. This framework [17,18] is extended by computing the local vertex from the two-particle Green's function by DMFT [19,20], which is combined with nonlocal bubble diagrams to construct a Bethe-Salpeter equation [21][22][23]. The latter is solved to yield the essential two-particle spin and charge susceptibilities χ d and χ m -physical observables which provide an important benchmark.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%