2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.035429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-phonon interaction in ultrasmall-radius carbon nanotubes

Abstract: We perform analysis of the band structure, phonon dispersion, and electron-phonon interactions in three types of small-radius carbon nanotubes. We find that the ͑5,5͒ nanotube can be described well by the zonefolding method and the electron-phonon interaction is too small to support either a charge-density wave or superconductivity at realistic temperatures. For ultrasmall ͑5,0͒ and ͑6,0͒ nanotubes we find that the large curvature makes these tubes metallic with a large density of states at the Fermi energy an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
93
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where k stands for the energy of the exchanged phonon with momentum k. The typical energy of the phonons in the optical branches ͑or in the acoustic branches at large momentum transfer͒ is of the order of ϳ0.1 eV, 29 and therefore comparable to the energy cutoff E c of the 1D electron system. This allows us to take the interaction arising from ͑18͒ as a source of attraction, in the energy range where the 1D model makes sense.…”
Section: Backscattering Interactions and Low-energy Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…where k stands for the energy of the exchanged phonon with momentum k. The typical energy of the phonons in the optical branches ͑or in the acoustic branches at large momentum transfer͒ is of the order of ϳ0.1 eV, 29 and therefore comparable to the energy cutoff E c of the 1D electron system. This allows us to take the interaction arising from ͑18͒ as a source of attraction, in the energy range where the 1D model makes sense.…”
Section: Backscattering Interactions and Low-energy Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 We may compare the results of our investigation with those obtained for the small-diameter zigzag nanotubes by means of ab initio simulations 28 and mean-fieldlike calculations. 29 In Ref. 29, a superconducting instability has been found to be dominant in the ͑5,0͒ nanotubes, at a scale of about 1 K. On the other hand, a CDW instability has been identified in the same geometry at room temperature in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations