2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2011
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2011.6154422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron response in windowless Si(Li), SDD and PIN diode photodetectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to energy dependency, there is higher dependency in the 33 keV up to 100 keV range. However, this could be attenuated with the application of coatings [14,4]. The electric current level generated by the BPW34 photodiode is adequate to construct an op-amp based electrometer design, as part of a occupational radiation exposure monitoring system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With respect to energy dependency, there is higher dependency in the 33 keV up to 100 keV range. However, this could be attenuated with the application of coatings [14,4]. The electric current level generated by the BPW34 photodiode is adequate to construct an op-amp based electrometer design, as part of a occupational radiation exposure monitoring system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of low energy photons, the electrical current is produced by the photoelectric effect as a result of the interaction of the radiation in the intrinsic layer, and by the Compton effect for X-rays of high energy [1,2]. Photodiodes have been evaluated for detection of ionizing radiation for therapy and diagnostic radiology, including X-ray tomography [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The response function of silicon detectors to electrons has been studied previously, for example [18,12]. The response is defined by an absorption peak and an escape component; where in the energy range measured in this work the escape component would be due to electron backscattering, energy straggling in the source construction and energy loss in the silicon dead layer [19,20].…”
Section: Conversion Electron Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 97%