2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2018.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron spectroscopy with a commercial 4H-SiC photodiode

Abstract: A Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) 4H-SiC p-n photodiode (sold as a UV detector) was investigated as detector of electrons (βparticles) over the temperature range 100 °C to 20 °C. The photodiode had an active area of 0.06 mm 2. The currents of the photodiode were measured in dark condition and under the illumination of a 63 Ni radioisotope βparticle source (endpoint energy = 66 keV). The photodiode was then coupled to a custom-made low-noise charge-sensitive preamplifier to make a direct detection particle coun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the manufacturer stated donor concentration (8 × 10 15 cm -3 ) [29] and the abrupt junction approximation [30], a depletion width of 3.7 µm at 100 V would have been expected, although no uncertainty in the concentration was stated by the manufacturer. However, despite the depletion region seemingly being only a portion of the epitaxial layer thickness, results previously reported for a detector of the same type (but in that case used as an electron spectrometer [31]) suggested that the entire epitaxial width of the detector was active for radiation detection. It is possible that a significant portion of the epitaxial layer was not depleted and that despite this the whole of the epitaxial layer contributed to the detected signal since the electron and hole recombination lengths in ND-NA = 8 × 10 15 cm -3 n-type and NA-ND = 6 × 10 18 cm -3 p-type doped SiC are ≈ 1.1 µm [32] and ≈ 20 µm [33] respectively.…”
Section: Capacitance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the manufacturer stated donor concentration (8 × 10 15 cm -3 ) [29] and the abrupt junction approximation [30], a depletion width of 3.7 µm at 100 V would have been expected, although no uncertainty in the concentration was stated by the manufacturer. However, despite the depletion region seemingly being only a portion of the epitaxial layer thickness, results previously reported for a detector of the same type (but in that case used as an electron spectrometer [31]) suggested that the entire epitaxial width of the detector was active for radiation detection. It is possible that a significant portion of the epitaxial layer was not depleted and that despite this the whole of the epitaxial layer contributed to the detected signal since the electron and hole recombination lengths in ND-NA = 8 × 10 15 cm -3 n-type and NA-ND = 6 × 10 18 cm -3 p-type doped SiC are ≈ 1.1 µm [32] and ≈ 20 µm [33] respectively.…”
Section: Capacitance Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Measurements of capacitance as a function of reverse bias suggested that the detector could be depleted to 2.41 µm ± 0.03 µm at 20 °C, short of what was expected from the abrupt junction calculation [30] (3.7 µm at 100 V). Notwithstanding this, a previous electron spectroscopy study suggested that most of the epitaxial width (5.15 µm) was depleted and active [31]. It was also noted that carrier recombination lengths in the material were sufficiently large to address the difference in depletion width calculated from the capacitance -voltage measurements and the previous study that suggested the entire epitaxial thickness was active.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondary electron generation was not included in the simulations. The same CASINO settings and presently reported methodology were used in refs [35], [36], and [37], to simulate similar situations in GaAs, SiC, and InGaP electron detectors. Fig.…”
Section: Detector Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bank of 14 computers, each with an Intel i7-6700 (4 cores, 3.40 GHz) processor and 32 GB of random access memory, was used to perform the simulations. The presently reported methodology was the same as that used in refs [35], [36], and [37].…”
Section: Expected Spectrum Incident On the Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%