1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-577x(97)00117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron spin resonance properties of ZnO microcrystallites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…than free-electron g factor), whereas paramagnetic signals with g values bigger than g e (positive g-shift), corresponding to oxygen vacancies with a single trapped electron (V O + ), were observed in defected ZnO, [28][29][30] [32,33] however, the low content and the intensification of the EPR signal after reduction indicate the signal should not be related to Fe…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…than free-electron g factor), whereas paramagnetic signals with g values bigger than g e (positive g-shift), corresponding to oxygen vacancies with a single trapped electron (V O + ), were observed in defected ZnO, [28][29][30] [32,33] however, the low content and the intensification of the EPR signal after reduction indicate the signal should not be related to Fe…”
Section: Full Papermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…An explanation could be that the existence of complex defect structures (such as neighboring vacancies) might form in R-BaAl 2 O 4 because of the reduction in the H 2 flow, while no such process was performed in the cases where a small g-shift was observed. [28][29][30][31] Further tests need to be done to allow us to draw further conclusions.…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). The low-field signal with g-factor close to the free-electron value (g = 2.0023) is generally attributed to an unpaired electron trapped on an oxygen vacancy site (g = 1.9965, 1.9948; [39] 2.0190; [40] 2.0106 [41] ). The other, highfield signal at g » 1.96, which was sometimes also attributed to unpaired electrons trapped on oxygen vacancies, has been reported to result from shallow donor centers such as ionized impurity atoms in the crystal lattice of ZnO.…”
Section: Impurities and Oxygen Vacanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] A signal with g = 2.003 was attributed to chemisorbed O 2 ± . [11,13] Two EPR studies on ZnO nanocrystallites found signals with g = 2.0190 [12] and g = 2.0106 [10] which was attributed to O 2± vacancies located at the surface of nanocrystallites. The location of defects at the surface was confirmed by reduction of EPR signal intensity by coating the particles with a layer of surfactant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of defects at the surface was confirmed by reduction of EPR signal intensity by coating the particles with a layer of surfactant. [12] However, many EPR studies attribute the commonly observed signal g = 1.96 to the singly ionized oxygen vacancy V + o . [1,4±6,11,16,18] Based on the correlation between the intensity of this EPR signal and the green PL intensity, green emission has been explained as the transition between a singly charged oxygen vacancy and a photoexcited hole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%