2014
DOI: 10.1142/s0217979214300138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron systems out of equilibrium: Nonequilibrium Green's function approach

Abstract: This review deals with the state of the art and perspectives of description of nonequilibrium many-body systems using the nonequilibrium Green's function (NGF) method. The basic aim is to describe time evolution of the many-body system from its initial state over its transient dynamics to its long time asymptotic evolution. First, we discuss basic aims of transport theories to motivate the introduction of the NGF techniques. Second, this article summarizes the present view on construction of the electron trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 220 publications
(151 reference statements)
0
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the Keldysh real time Non‐Equilibrium Green's Functions , but instead of the standard Keldysh triplet GR,GA,K we employ the equivalent choice GR,GA,G<, where G< is the “less” particle correlation function (Langreth‐Wilkins (LW) convention ). These Green's functions obey their Dyson equations, whose integro‐differential form is (with =1, and σ=,; opposite spin denoted by σ¯) truerightnormalitGσR(t,t)=εbGσR(t,t)+ttΣσRGσR,for the propagators (only the equation for the retarded GR is shown), while for G< we have: truerightnormalitGσ<(t,t)=εbGσ<(t,t)+t0tΣσRGσ<+t0tΣσ<GσA.The propagators are insensitive to the initial conditions and obey the equal time boundary condition ...…”
Section: Formalism: Non‐equilibrium Green's Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We use the Keldysh real time Non‐Equilibrium Green's Functions , but instead of the standard Keldysh triplet GR,GA,K we employ the equivalent choice GR,GA,G<, where G< is the “less” particle correlation function (Langreth‐Wilkins (LW) convention ). These Green's functions obey their Dyson equations, whose integro‐differential form is (with =1, and σ=,; opposite spin denoted by σ¯) truerightnormalitGσR(t,t)=εbGσR(t,t)+ttΣσRGσR,for the propagators (only the equation for the retarded GR is shown), while for G< we have: truerightnormalitGσ<(t,t)=εbGσ<(t,t)+t0tΣσRGσ<+t0tΣσ<GσA.The propagators are insensitive to the initial conditions and obey the equal time boundary condition ...…”
Section: Formalism: Non‐equilibrium Green's Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the Ansatz itself consists in an approximate factorization of the particle correlation function, the GKBA decoupling , Gσ<false(t,tfalse)=GσRfalse(t,tfalse)nσfalse(tfalse)+nσfalse(tfalse)GσAfalse(t,tfalse)The Ansatz simplifies to a few scalar relations here, to be compared with the general case where G<=GRρ+ρGA with ρ denoting the one‐particle density matrix. Second, the theory is assumed to be self‐consistent, i.e., the self‐energy matrix is assumed to be a functional of the Green's function, Σ=Σ[G].…”
Section: Formalism: Generalized Master Equations (Gme)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations