2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Transport through Metal/MoS2 Interfaces: Edge- or Area-Dependent Process?

Abstract: In ultra-thin two-dimensional (2-D) materials, the formation of ohmic contacts with top metallic layers is a challenging task that involves different processes than in bulk-like structures. Besides the Schottky barrier height, the transfer length of electrons between metals and 2-D monolayers is a highly relevant parameter. For MoS 2 , both short (≤30 nm) and long (≥0.5 µm) values have been reported, corresponding to either an abrupt carrier injection at the contact edge or a more gradual transfer of electrons… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(100 reference statements)
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a shows that Ion (@ ns = 10 13 cm -2 ) does not degrade as Lcont is scaled down to 13nm. This agrees with TCAD simulations 10,17,18 that predict contact edge injection of carriers for 1-3 layers of MoS2 channel. This observation holds true for three different Lch (30 nm, 100 nm, nm) over a wide range of Lcont (500nm to 13nm) and for varying lateral field (VDS = 0.05 V, V).…”
Section: B Contact Length Scalingsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3a shows that Ion (@ ns = 10 13 cm -2 ) does not degrade as Lcont is scaled down to 13nm. This agrees with TCAD simulations 10,17,18 that predict contact edge injection of carriers for 1-3 layers of MoS2 channel. This observation holds true for three different Lch (30 nm, 100 nm, nm) over a wide range of Lcont (500nm to 13nm) and for varying lateral field (VDS = 0.05 V, V).…”
Section: B Contact Length Scalingsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, injection is only allowed from the edge of the metal contact directly into the carrier-rich channel, which is also predicted in other work 18,19 . For thicker MoS2 (more than 5 ML), the MoS2 region underneath the contact is no longer depleted and a longer section of the contact contributes to carrier injection 20,21,22 .…”
Section: B Contact Length Scalingsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It was constructed according to the upscaling technique described in Ref. 10 for the Ti-MoS 2 edge contact structure depicted schematically in Fig. S10a.…”
Section: S6 Quantum Transport Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the transfer length of top contact, which decides the "effective" contact area, is still controversial. [65][66][67] Fundamental understanding of carrier injection from the outof-plane top contact to the in-plane 2D material is essential. Edge contact is immune from contact length scaling, but a lower specific contact resistivity (sub 10 À9 Ω cm 2 ) than that of Si technology to reach comparable contact resistance is needed.…”
Section: Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%