2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3646732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-vibron coupling in halogenated acenaphthenequinone upon O K-edge soft x-ray absorption

Abstract: We present high resolution oxygen K near-edge x-ray absorption spectra of the acenaphthenequinone (ANQ) derivative 3,8-dibromo-5,6-dichloro-ANQ (Br 2 Cl 2 -ANQ). The spectral features exhibit an almost identical vibronic fine structure compared to that shown by ANQ. The unequal distances of the vibronic levels as derived from the least-squares fit analysis of the vibronic progressions allows us to determine the anharmonicity of the excited state potentials involved. We conclude that a single vibrational progre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of excitation energies (ω ex ) of the spectroscopic bright excited states of ANQ (O 1s), thymine (N 1s and O 1s), and the allyl radical (C 1s) calculated using CVS-(U)ADC(2)-x 24,25 and CVS-(U)ADC (3,2) in combination with the 6-311++G** basis set with experimental data. 35,43,87 δ(3-2x) describes the differences of excitation energies between CVS-ADC(2)-x and CVS-ADC(3,2), δ(3-Expt.) describes the differences of excitation energies between CVS-ADC(3,2) and experimental values, and δ(2x-Expt.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of excitation energies (ω ex ) of the spectroscopic bright excited states of ANQ (O 1s), thymine (N 1s and O 1s), and the allyl radical (C 1s) calculated using CVS-(U)ADC(2)-x 24,25 and CVS-(U)ADC (3,2) in combination with the 6-311++G** basis set with experimental data. 35,43,87 δ(3-2x) describes the differences of excitation energies between CVS-ADC(2)-x and CVS-ADC(3,2), δ(3-Expt.) describes the differences of excitation energies between CVS-ADC(3,2) and experimental values, and δ(2x-Expt.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent difference between theory and experiment is the missing shoulder in the high energy flank of the lowest excitation peak. In previous experiments additonal fine structures have been observed in high resolution NEXAFS spectra which were identified as coupling of the electronic transitions to various vibronic excitations [50,51]. These features have only been observed in gas phase C K-edge NEXAFS spectra of small aromatic hydrocarbons or in O K-edge NEXAFS spectra of substituted aromatic molecules, which suggests an efficient coupling to C=O stretching mode, while they have not been observed in any C K-edge NEXAFS data of condensed aromatic molecules.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is already the case in organic molecules, the vibronic fine structure of which can be observed in XANES or NEXAFS (Near-Edge Xray Absorption Fine Structure) spectra. For instance in the last ten years, XANES spectroscopy has revealed the vibronic structure of naphtalene, 5 biphenyl 6 and even larger molecules such as NTCDA 7 at the C K-edge, the vibronic structure of acetonitrile 8 and acrylonitrile 9 at the N K-edge, and more recently the one of halogenated acenaphthenequinone 10 at the O K-edge. The vibronic component of the lowest core-excited state of OH and OD was observed at the O K-edge as well.…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%