2013
DOI: 10.4172/2155-6210.1000e123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Work Function–An Effective Parameter for In-situ Reflection of Electron Activities in Various Processes

Abstract: Electron work function (EWF) is the minimum energy required to move electrons at the Fermi level from inside a conducting material to its surface with zero kinetic energy [1,2]. This fundamental parameter largely reflects electron activities and is directly related to chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of materials [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Recent studies have shown that EWF can be used as a sensitive parameter to characterize many surface properties of biomaterials. As an example [9], the affinity of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower values of specific activity and activity retention noticed for enzymes immobilized onto SBA 15 compared with nanoSiO 2 , might be explained by two factors: (i) lower amount of immobilized biocatalysts and (ii) hindered accessibility of the enzyme active sites for the substrates molecules due to immobilization of enzymes mainly into the pores of the support. Nevertheless, lower activity of immobilized XDH compared with GDH is probably related to the larger conformational changes of 3-D biomolecule structure that occur upon immobilization, as reported earlier by Li et al [19] There is no available literature about efficient immobilization of XDH, and though there are some reports about immobilization of GDH, results presented here go further than previously published data. For example, Baron et al used controlled pore silica with average pore size of 500 Å , as a support for Bacillus megaterium glucose dehydrogenase and immobilized less than 0.5 mg of enzyme per 1 g of the support, [20] whereas here we report a loading capacity of silica nanoparticles of 2.8 mg/g, probably due to higher density of hydroxyl groups on the surface of nanoSiO 2 .…”
Section: Gdh and Xdh Immobilizationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The lower values of specific activity and activity retention noticed for enzymes immobilized onto SBA 15 compared with nanoSiO 2 , might be explained by two factors: (i) lower amount of immobilized biocatalysts and (ii) hindered accessibility of the enzyme active sites for the substrates molecules due to immobilization of enzymes mainly into the pores of the support. Nevertheless, lower activity of immobilized XDH compared with GDH is probably related to the larger conformational changes of 3-D biomolecule structure that occur upon immobilization, as reported earlier by Li et al [19] There is no available literature about efficient immobilization of XDH, and though there are some reports about immobilization of GDH, results presented here go further than previously published data. For example, Baron et al used controlled pore silica with average pore size of 500 Å , as a support for Bacillus megaterium glucose dehydrogenase and immobilized less than 0.5 mg of enzyme per 1 g of the support, [20] whereas here we report a loading capacity of silica nanoparticles of 2.8 mg/g, probably due to higher density of hydroxyl groups on the surface of nanoSiO 2 .…”
Section: Gdh and Xdh Immobilizationsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…FRET-based FIs have also been investigated for biosensing platforms. [86][87][88][89][90] The FRET effect is a unique and interesting optical phenomenon that occurs between different types of fluorescent materials that possess different bandgap energies for fluorescence irradiation. [91][92][93] In this case, energy transfer takes place from the higher bandgap energy to the lower bandgap energy through dipole-dipole interactions within the range of approximately 10 nm.…”
Section: Fluorescent Qds For Biosensing Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the carbohydrate antigens (CA125, CA724, CA199, etc.) have been reported for many times [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%