“…The Rwp values varied between 0.35 and 0.55 and the M values were between 1.8 and 3, where the smaller values correspond to the larger dislocation densities in correlation with the screening effect of dislocations [6]. Table 2 The median and variance, m and , of the log-normal size distribution of sub-grains, the area average mean crystallite size, x area , the average dislocation density, , the average density of twin boundaries,ˇand the q parameter values for the dislocation contrast factors, for the three materials, Cu, Cu-10%Zn and Cu-30%Zn at positions of 0 R, (1/2) R and 1 R, respectively [40,41]. Rwp in the last row gives the reliability of the fit, cf.…”