“…So far, studies have found no difference between early and late 3d metals as regards the structures of monometallic di-and tri-carbides: MC 2 clusters (MϭSc, Ti, V, Fe, Co, and Ni͒ are isosceles triangles in the ground state, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] and MC 3 clusters (MϭSc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe and Ni͒ have two-dimensional ''fan'' structures in which the M atom is bound to all three C atoms and the latter are bound together in a bent chain. 17,24 -26 Moreover, although in principle the early or late character of each M is expected to be more clearly manifested by dimetallic carbide clusters, extensive studies of M 2 C 2 clusters (MϭTi, V, and Co͒ using density-functional theory ͑DFT͒ have found no clear early-late difference: the ground-state geometries of V 2 C 2 and Co 2 C 2 , and the Ti 2 C 2 isomer of second-lowest energy, are all planar rings with transannular M-C bonds, [27][28][29] although ground-state Ti 2 C 2 is a planar ring with a transannular C-C bond. 29 However, recent experimental and DFT studies of Co 2 C 3 and V 2 C 3 by Tono et al 28 have shown that differences between early and late 3d metals are significant for M 2 C 3 , i.e., when the M/C proportion is the same as in met-cars, 1-7 whereas Co 2 C 3 has a C 2v -symmetric planar CoCCCCo-ring structure with a bent C 3 chain similar to free C 3 ͑Ref.…”