1989
DOI: 10.1021/ja00203a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic and Raman spectroscopic properties of oxo-bridged dinuclear iron centers in proteins and model compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

22
178
2
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
22
178
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Methane monooxygenase also differs from the R2 protein of ribonucleotide reductase by having a hydroxo species as the bridging oxygen instead of a ,u-0x0 group. The absorbance in the 300-400 nm region of ribonucleotide reductase has been assigned to an 0x0 -+ Fe3' charge transfer band [27] which is shifted to lower wavelengths when the oxygen is protonated [28], accounting for the lack of electronic absorption above 300 nm in methane monooxygenase. An additional feature of both the methane monooxygenase and ribonucleotide reductase active sites is the presence of a hydrophobic cavity formed adjacent to the iron center by a series of conserved residues within the four-helical bundle (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methane monooxygenase also differs from the R2 protein of ribonucleotide reductase by having a hydroxo species as the bridging oxygen instead of a ,u-0x0 group. The absorbance in the 300-400 nm region of ribonucleotide reductase has been assigned to an 0x0 -+ Fe3' charge transfer band [27] which is shifted to lower wavelengths when the oxygen is protonated [28], accounting for the lack of electronic absorption above 300 nm in methane monooxygenase. An additional feature of both the methane monooxygenase and ribonucleotide reductase active sites is the presence of a hydrophobic cavity formed adjacent to the iron center by a series of conserved residues within the four-helical bundle (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1)]. As an alternative, the NRVS spectrum of the Fe(III) 2 (Table S1) (34). Due to the difference in energy of the major NRVS features of the Fe(III) 2 precursor relative to the high-valent Fe(IV) 2 and Fe(III)Fe(IV) species, samples that had some decay to the Fe(III) 2 species (due to accidental warming above −80°C in transfer) were excluded during data collection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 nm (eV) suggesting that it is not associated with the π-conjugated ring. Fe-O-Fe bridges have been reported to exhibit UV/vis absorbances at 360-380 nm which have been attributed to charge transfer states [15,[22][23][24][25]. Although they are not evident in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of the spectra makes it difficult to identify any features uniquely attributable to the dimer and consequently the Fe-O-Fe bridge. While the asymmetric stretch of bridged porphyrin dimers has been reported to lie at ≈ 850 cm −1 , the symmetric stretch, which should be Raman active, has been reported to lie at ≈ 450 cm −1 [14,15,[25][26][27][28]. In the spectra of Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%