between atoms in bonds.32 Orbital u3 has nodes between atom pairs 1 and 2 and pairs 3 and 4, and the 2-3 interaction is bonding, again different from the 5c scheme. Thus we would expect the 4c hypervalent bond to be significantly weaker than the 3c or 5c hypervalent bonds. In the 4c bond, nodes occur between atoms in the occupied orbitals whereas, in the 3c and 5c bond, nodes occur at atoms in these orbitals. The above simple model assumes that the atoms are of equal electronegativity. However, in [ FKrNCH]+ the atoms are clearly not of equal electronegativity. Furthermore, the C-H bond is of the right energy for mixing, which complicates the analysis. The presence of a triple bond between C and N is also a complicating factor, as this increases the s component (sp hybridization) in the C-N u bond, which would be part of the 4c hypervalent bond. Examination of Figure 1 shows that the orbitals do not delocalize as extensively as suggested by our model for the 4c hypervalent bond due to the large electronegativity differences. Furthermore, the s and p orbitals are clearly mixed. The highest occupied u orbital, u6, is similar to orbital u2/ of the 4c bond with the largest population on N and the next highest population on F. Because of the large s character in the C N u bond, this orbital is very low in energy and the C-H u bond mixes with the Kr-F u bond instead of mixing with the C-N u bond as one would expect from the 4c hypervalent bond. The C N u bond is mixing, instead, with the (32) Arduengo, A. J.; Burgess, E. M. J . Am. Chem. SOC. 1977, 99, 2376.Kr valence s orbital. Thus the bonding of the u,' orbital of the 4c bond is dispersed over a range of CT orbitals, Another model for this bonding would involve considering both the C-N and C-H bonds as "spectators" and dealing only with a normal 3c,4e hypervalent bond centered at Kr based on the Kr-F bond and the lone pair on N. In this case, u6 of [FKrNCH]' is like u2" of the 3c,4e bond. There is essentially a node at Kr, and the population is not equally distributed between N and F. The u4 orbital of the complex then corresponds to u," of the 3c,4e bond. A complication for this model is that the 3c,4e bond preferentially places the least electronegative atom in the center. Clearly, "Kr+" is not the least electronegative atom. In order for it to lower its electronegativity in order to participate in the hypervalent bond, charge transfer occurs from the C-H region to the Kr to lower its positive charge and hence its electronegativity. This is actually observed in the population analysis and is consistent with the resonance structure shown above.All of our results are consistent with some type of covalent bonding interaction in [FKrNCH]+ being present. However, as the above discussion points out, there is no clear choice between the 3c and 4c hypervalent bond models. Rather, the bonding description for the interaction of [FKr]+ with N C H has components of both models present. The results do show that the bonding between Kr and N is not a simple covalent u bond betwe...