2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic aspects of formation and properties of local structures around Mn in Cd1−xMnxTe1−ySey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In view of its great technological importance, Cd1-xMnxTe alloy has been a subject of various theoretical investigations, from empirical [11] to first principles based on the density functional theory (DFT) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Although the overall picture regarding its structural, electronic and optical properties has been thoroughly studied, some details concerning energy position and hybridization of the Mn 3d-state are still questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In view of its great technological importance, Cd1-xMnxTe alloy has been a subject of various theoretical investigations, from empirical [11] to first principles based on the density functional theory (DFT) [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Although the overall picture regarding its structural, electronic and optical properties has been thoroughly studied, some details concerning energy position and hybridization of the Mn 3d-state are still questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the overall picture regarding its structural, electronic and optical properties has been thoroughly studied, some details concerning energy position and hybridization of the Mn 3d-state are still questionable. Most of the published ab initio studies were performed using the pseudo-potential or the full-potential linearized-augmented plane wave methods within the local density approximation (LDA) [12] or the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. One of the main drawbacks of DFT approximations, such as the LDA and GGA, is the underestimation the band gap of semiconductors and insulators compared to the experimental gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron-doped II-VI semiconductors exhibit advantageous spectroscopic characteristics which make them particularly suitable for mid-IR laser fabrication [1][2][3]. These materials are also prospective for spintronics applications [4,5] and can serve as convenient model systems for studying mechanisms of magnetic interaction [6], effects related to charge order [7] and atomic correlations [8,9]. In multi-component II-VI semiconductors replacement of group II cation and/or group VI anion offers possibility to simultaneously adjust the band gap and lattice constant [10] and allows for independent engineering of the Fe absorption and photoluminescence bands' positions by varying composition, type and amount of the substitute ions [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this prospective research field huge efforts are being made in order to realize diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMSs), materials which can sustain ferromagnetic order above room 3 temperature. In search for the room temperature ferromagnetism (RTFM) in DMSs [6][7][8][9][10] along with the most extensively studied Mn-based systems [3,[11][12][13], possibilities to utilize other TM impurities (Fe, Co, Cr, …) in various wide band-gap semiconductor hosts are also being explored [6,[14][15][16][17][18]. Iron-based DMSs are promising in this respect, with RTFM already achieved in a number of III-V [19,20], and II-VI semiconductor hosts [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial substitution of the chalcogen ion (Ch) offers an additional possibility to tailor material properties (i.e. crystal structure, electronic and magnetic properties) [13,25,26]. The most striking effect of the Ch ion substitution can be seen in the new family of iron chalcogenide superconductors Fe(Te, Se, S) [27][28][29], where Te substitution by S promotes superconductivity in otherwise nonsuperconductive FeTe [28], whereas partial substitution of Se by Te increases superconducting temperature of FeSe [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%