1995
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(94)00115-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic beam steering of shock waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, the primary focus of customizing the acoustic field has been to electronically steer the focus to track the kidney stone during treatment. 20,21 Both studies employed a spherical transducer array with high voltage pulser circuits for each individual element and achieved efficient focusing in an ellipsoidal region of about 4 cm in diameter and 6 cm in length. The present work employs a similar spherical transducer and pulse generator system to customize spatial pressure distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the primary focus of customizing the acoustic field has been to electronically steer the focus to track the kidney stone during treatment. 20,21 Both studies employed a spherical transducer array with high voltage pulser circuits for each individual element and achieved efficient focusing in an ellipsoidal region of about 4 cm in diameter and 6 cm in length. The present work employs a similar spherical transducer and pulse generator system to customize spatial pressure distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main sources of uncertainty in our measurements are: pressure-averaging effect over the surface of the hydrophone active element, error in the measured value of the shockwave hydrophone sensitivity, 36 and error in the measurement of the generator electro-acoustical conversion factor at its source surface. 30,37 Among these, we believe that the first one, i.e., the effect of pressure averaging over the surface of hydrophone active element, has had the most important influence on our measurements, especially in nonlinear regime when the focus dimensions become comparable with, or even smaller than, the hydrophone active element size (⌽ϭ1 mm in our measurements͒. To obtain an idea of the influence of this averaging effect on our results, we made a simple simulation in nonlinear regime and in water.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our laboratory, a new shock-wave generator was developed to achieve focused tissue destruction by shock waveinduced cavitation [ 19], [20]. For the field characterization of this generator (particularly at the focal region) we have used the different kinds of commercially available hydrophones which are applicable for shock wave measurements, including PVDF bilaminar shielded membrane and PVDF needle hydrophones.…”
Section: Physical Parameters Of the Shock-wave Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past few years, a series of shock-wave generators for lithotripsy and/or tissue destruction studies has been developed in our laboratory [19], [20]. The last version of them that was used in this study is a piezoelectric generator with electronic focusing capability.…”
Section: A Shock-wave Generatormentioning
confidence: 99%