2021
DOI: 10.1111/trf.16269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic clinical decision support: Evidence that default settings influence end‐user behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This policy reduced RBC transfusion usage institution-wide by 11%. 14 The primary safety outcome was emergency-release RBC transfusion. Emergency-release transfusion included uncrossmatched RBC units, either O-negative or type-specific.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This policy reduced RBC transfusion usage institution-wide by 11%. 14 The primary safety outcome was emergency-release RBC transfusion. Emergency-release transfusion included uncrossmatched RBC units, either O-negative or type-specific.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedding randomisations efficiently into hospital transfusion systems will be challenging, and more clarity is needed on the optimal approaches for achieving this aim. 57,62 These new strategies provide a real opportunity to improve transfusion practice, which is viewed by patient and public members of our PPIE panel as an imperative for researcher teams, given their custodianship of public health data and blood as a donated altruistic resource. Collaborations with colleagues across the globe promote the building of a strong shared learning approach, so that challenges to the use of data are collectively addressed, to ensure improvements benefit both patients and blood donors in all settings, including low-resource country settings.…”
Section: H E L Pi Ng To Sh a Pe Th E Broa Der I N Te R Nationa L Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A focussed review on CDSS in transfusion described 20 separate studies, but nearly all studies were ‘before and after’ designs rather than randomised controlled trials or other more methodologically robust clinical trial designs 61 . The review concluded that while implementation of a CDSS might improve red blood cell usage, there were many uncertainties regarding the optimal features of these systems, 62 as well as their impact on cost savings, effects on patient outcomes and the sustainability of any effects. The authors also made recommendations for standardised reporting of outcomes, not least the nature of the algorithm used.…”
Section: Computerised Decision Support Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation