Electronic consent in clinical care: an international scoping review

Abstract

ObjectiveDigital technologies create opportunities for improvement of consenting processes in clinical care. Yet little is known about the prevalence, characteristics or outcomes of shifting from paper to electronic consenting, or e-consent, in clinical settings. Thus questions remain around e-consent’s impact on efficiency, data integrity, user experience, care access, equity and quality. Our objective was to scope all known findings on this critical topic.Materials and methodsThrough an international, systematic scoping review, we identified and assessed all published findings on clinical e-consent in the scholarly and grey literatures, including consents for telehealth encounters, procedures and health information exchanges. From each relevant publication, we abstracted data on study design, measures, findings and other study features.Main outcome measuresMetrics describing or evaluating clinical e-consent, including preferences for paper versus e-consenting; efficiency (eg, time, workload) and effectiveness (eg, data integrity, care quality). User characteristics were captured where available.ResultsA total of 25 articles published since 2005, most from North America or Europe, report on the deployment of e-consent in surgery, oncology and other clinical settings. Experimental designs and other study characteristics vary, but nearly all focus on procedural e-consents. Synthesis reveals relatively consistent findings around improved efficiency and data integrity with, and user preferences for, e-consent. Care access and quality issues are less frequently explored, with disparate findings.Discussion and conclusionThe literature is nascent and largely focused on issues that are immediate and straightforward to measure. As virtual care pathways expand, more research is urgently needed to ensure that care quality and access are advanced, not compromised, by e-consent.

Greater Patient Than Staff Satisfaction Scores for Electronic Consent

“…Literature on patient and staff satisfaction with e-consent in clinical practice is nascent, but some studies have shown a preference for e-consent [22], and higher shared decision-making scores have been demonstrated [7,23]. E-consent has been widely used in medical research, and studies have shown similar findings, in which e-consent participants are satisfied and can have a better understanding of information, but there are issues with using technology and authentication [24].…”

Improving prenatal diagnosis through standards and aggregation

“…Methods such as computerized consent and consent to share with specific prenatal resources can be incorporated into test requisition forms in collaboration with clinics and testing laboratories. [34][35][36][37][38][39] Given that the agreements can be challenging to arrange due to varied institutional processes, streamlining such processes can drastically reduce the logistical hurdles for data sharing. Finally, through resources such as GenomeConnect, 40 individuals can be directly engaged in collaboration with a sequencing laboratory.…”

Sustainable dermatology—A practical guide for the Australian dermatologist

“…There are also the intangible benefits of patient and doctor satisfaction along with improved delivery of health care if extended to areas such as electronic consent. 45…”