2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Continuous Pain Measurement vs Verbal Rating Scale in gynaecology: A prospective cohort study

Abstract: To compare pain measured with a new electronic devicethe Continuous Pain Score Meter (CPSM)and the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) during gynaecological procedures in an outpatient setting, and to correlate these outcomes with baseline anxiety and patient (in)tolerance to the procedure. Study design: This prospective cohort study was undertaken in two centres: a university hospital and a large teaching hospital in The Netherlands. Patients undergoing an outpatient hysteroscopy, colposcopy or ovum pick-up procedure f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Self-report" (29) is the primary way for pain measurement. There are various scales such as Verbal Rating Scales (VRS) (30), Numerical rating scales (NRS) (31), Visual Analog Scales (VAS) (32), Smiley-based Wong-Baker Scale (WBS) (33), Faces Pain Scales-Revised (FPS-R) (34) are used to get the selfreports from the chronic pain patients (35)(36)(37)(38). The second way of measuring pain is the "Observe behavior and infer" method (39).…”
Section: Pain Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Self-report" (29) is the primary way for pain measurement. There are various scales such as Verbal Rating Scales (VRS) (30), Numerical rating scales (NRS) (31), Visual Analog Scales (VAS) (32), Smiley-based Wong-Baker Scale (WBS) (33), Faces Pain Scales-Revised (FPS-R) (34) are used to get the selfreports from the chronic pain patients (35)(36)(37)(38). The second way of measuring pain is the "Observe behavior and infer" method (39).…”
Section: Pain Identification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%