2002
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.232276699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic detection of DNA by its intrinsic molecular charge

Abstract: We report the selective and real-time detection of label-free DNA using an electronic readout. Microfabricated silicon field-effect sensors were used to directly monitor the increase in surface charge when DNA hybridizes on the sensor surface. The electrostatic immobilization of probe DNA on a positively charged poly-L-lysine layer allows hybridization at low ionic strength where field-effect sensing is most sensitive. Nanomolar DNA concentrations can be detected within minutes, and a single base mismatch with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

14
322
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 428 publications
(338 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
14
322
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…are the canonical examples [6], but similar mechanisms operate in semiconducting nanowires [7], semiconducting carbon nanotubes [8], electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor structures [9][10][11][12], suspended gate thin film transistors [13], and light-addressable potentiometric sensors [14,15]. These field-effect sensors rely on the interaction of external charges with carriers in a nearby semiconductor and thus exhibit enhanced sensitivity at low ionic strength where counterion shielding is reduced; this is explained in a recent review [16] and evidenced by the low salt concentrations often used (e.g., [7,10]). Even though the response of field-effect sensors can be characterized by channel conductance or capacitance of the electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor interface, we restrict this review to cases in which the impedance of the biological layer itself is measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are the canonical examples [6], but similar mechanisms operate in semiconducting nanowires [7], semiconducting carbon nanotubes [8], electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor structures [9][10][11][12], suspended gate thin film transistors [13], and light-addressable potentiometric sensors [14,15]. These field-effect sensors rely on the interaction of external charges with carriers in a nearby semiconductor and thus exhibit enhanced sensitivity at low ionic strength where counterion shielding is reduced; this is explained in a recent review [16] and evidenced by the low salt concentrations often used (e.g., [7,10]). Even though the response of field-effect sensors can be characterized by channel conductance or capacitance of the electrolyte-insulator-semiconductor interface, we restrict this review to cases in which the impedance of the biological layer itself is measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a variety of electrochemical detection methods have been studied 24,25 , the ion-sensitive field-effect transistor (ISFET) 26,27 was most applicable to our chemistry and scaling requirements because of its sensitivity to hydrogen ions, and its compatibility with CMOS processes [28][29][30][31] . Previous attempts to detect both single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) 32 and DNA synthesis 33 as well as sequence DNA electronically 34 have been made.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion-sensitive field effect transistors ͑ISFETs͒ have been combined with biological receptors ͑enzymes, oligonucleotides, and cells͒, and can be considered as a basic building block of microelectronic biosensors. [3][4][5] So far, there have only been a few reports investigating the applicability of diamond-based IS-FET devices. [6][7][8] The p-type conductive layer which is induced at the diamond surface by a hydrogen termination has been suggested as a very promising sensing system to be used in a liquid electrolyte environment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%