1992
DOI: 10.1557/proc-276-203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Determination of the Modulus of Elasticity and Intrinsic Stress of Thin Films using Capacitive Bridges

Abstract: We extend the method of Najafi and Suzuki [1] for the electronic determination of the modulus of elasticity and intrinsic stress of thin films using capacitive bridge structures. New theoretical concepts are introduced. The extended method does not require that the test structures be exercised to the point of snap-action.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A broad array of material property extraction methods has been proposed in the literature. These methods include a resonant frequency measurement technique on cantilever beam (CB) test structures [2], [3], a direct tensile stress measurement technique [4], a capacitance/voltage (C/V) measurement technique on fixed-fixed beam (FB) bridge structures [5], the direct mechanical bending of CB test structures by a known force and measurement of the resulting deflection [6], a load/deflection technique on suspended thinfilm membranes under tensile stress and known pressure load [1], [4], [7], and an electrostatic pull-in approach using tethered rigid parallel-plate structures [8]. Most of the techniques require special micromachined structures or special test fixtures, which makes them difficult to use in routine wafer-level measurements, for example, in a manufacturing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A broad array of material property extraction methods has been proposed in the literature. These methods include a resonant frequency measurement technique on cantilever beam (CB) test structures [2], [3], a direct tensile stress measurement technique [4], a capacitance/voltage (C/V) measurement technique on fixed-fixed beam (FB) bridge structures [5], the direct mechanical bending of CB test structures by a known force and measurement of the resulting deflection [6], a load/deflection technique on suspended thinfilm membranes under tensile stress and known pressure load [1], [4], [7], and an electrostatic pull-in approach using tethered rigid parallel-plate structures [8]. Most of the techniques require special micromachined structures or special test fixtures, which makes them difficult to use in routine wafer-level measurements, for example, in a manufacturing environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a) are widely used and studied in the microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) community. Such beams are used as switches [1] and resonators [2], [3], and for extracting material properties [4]- [6], [18]. One-dimensional (1D), quasi-two-dimensional (quasi-2D) and three-dimensional (3D) simulations of various accuracies and sophistication have been used to help understand and characterize these beams and devices [5]- [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In situ measurement is especially useful for monitoring material properties that can be highly process dependent [15]. Mechanical property test structures using in situ electrostatic actuation include beams and diaphragms actuated to pull-in (M-TEST) [8], [16]- [20], laterally resonant comb drives [21]- [24] and vertically resonant beams [16], [25]- [30], and capacitance-voltage measurements of fixed-fixed beam bridges [31], [32]. Nonelectrostatic methods for mechanical property measurement include load-deflection and bulge tests of membranes [33], measuring cantilever tip displacement with an externally applied force [34], and direct tensile measurement of strain [35].…”
Section: Methods For Geometry Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%