Electronic Dissemination of a Web-Based Video Promotes PrEP Contemplation and Conversation Among US Women Engaged in Care at Planned Parenthood

Calabrese, Sarah K.; Lane, Susan B.; Caldwell, Abigail; Kaplan, Clair; Dovidio, John F.; Galvao, Rachel W.; Ogburn, Damon F.; Safon, Cara B.; Tekeste, Mehrit; Taggart, Tamara; Modrakovic, Djordje; Wilbourn, Brittany; Blackstock, Oni J.; Kershaw, Trace

doi:10.1007/s10461-021-03210-2

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One month after the intervention, women who were enrolled in the web-based counseling method were more likely to be comfortable discussing PrEP with a provider (82 vs. 48%) and were more likely to be thinking about PrEP (36 vs. 4%). However, no women in this study initiated PrEP at 1 year follow up [44]. In a study evaluating 515 encounters in a family planning clinic, 76% of which were for abortion care, authors found the screening rate of their implementation strategy to be 51.3%, with those who were African American or who presented for abortion care to be more likely to be Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 78%

Provision of HIV preexposure prophylaxis to female patients seeking family planning services in the United States

Satish

Bravo

McAllister

et al. 2022

Aids

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:We conducted a scoping review to assess barriers to and facilitators of integrating HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and family planning (FP) at the patient, provider, and implementation levels, and to identify gaps in knowledge.Methods:We conducted a search of five bibliographic databases from database inception to March 2022: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus. Two reviewers screened abstracts and full texts to determine eligibility based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. We categorized studies by their relevance to patient, provider, and implementation barriers, and extracted data based on prespecified elements.Results:Our initial search strategy yielded 1151 results, and 34 publications were included. Barriers to PrEP implementation in family planning settings included low PrEP knowledge among patients, hesitance to take PrEP due to perceived stigma, decreased willingness of providers unfamiliar with PrEP to prescribe PrEP, and limited financial and staffing resources that make prescribing and monitoring PrEP difficult. Facilitators included robust training for providers, stigma reduction efforts, leadership engagement, and increased resources specifically in settings with processes in place that ease the process of prescribing and monitoring PrEP.Conclusions:Advances in implementation strategy development, stigma reduction, and drug development will be essential to reinforcing PrEP care in family planning settings and thereby reducing the incidence of HIV in women through highly effective pharmacologic HIV prevention methods.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 78%