2006
DOI: 10.1021/cr050166o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Excitations in Metals and at Metal Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
211
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 500 publications
8
211
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of the WPP method can be found elsewhere. 22,23 Here we only give the aspects specific for the present study. In brief, the one-electron wave packet incident from the STM tip is propagated through the junction by solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE).…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The details of the WPP method can be found elsewhere. 22,23 Here we only give the aspects specific for the present study. In brief, the one-electron wave packet incident from the STM tip is propagated through the junction by solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TDSE).…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of the peaks, on the other hand, is given by the overlap between the resonance wave function and the initial state used in the WPP. 23 A simple comparison between the clean surface [panel (a)] and ad-island results [panels (b) and (c)] allows one to assign the different resonances (in particular, to reveal the island-localized states) and their evolution upon the change of the experimental conditions. Thus, the additional bright lines that appear in the calculated PDOS(E,V ) for the island on top of the metal surface [panels (b) and (c)] correspond to island-induced states whose energies are not very close to the other FER's, as compared to their width.…”
Section: Theoretical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although energy-relaxation mechanisms have been theoretically intensively investigated 19 , experimentally they are usually summarized within a single parameter: the aforementioned lifetime 17 , which corresponds to a non-zero imaginary part of the quasiparticle self-energy. To investigate many-body effects in more detail, recent experimental and theoretical efforts aimed at using QPI to probe both the real and imaginary part of the selfenergy, an approach which allowed to visualize the presence of band-dispersion renormalization effects [20][21][22] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,38,53 We use a well established approach where the electron-electron decay rate of excited states is performed at¯ point (k = 0) by projecting the imaginary part of the self-energy onto the corresponding wave function. 30,45 In the present symmetry, we have…”
Section: B Many-body Calculation Of the Decay Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,28 The lifetime sets the duration of the excitation and, when combined with the group velocity, it also determines the spatial range of the excitation. For metals and metallic nanostructures at surfaces, several decay channels determine the dynamics of excited electrons for which the total decay rate (proportional to the inverse of the lifetime τ ) can be expressed as a sum of different contributions: 29,30 =h/τ = γ 1e + γ e-e + γ e-ph + γ def .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%