Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment

Abstract

Background Despite evidence suggesting higher quality and safer care in hospitals with comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) systems, factors related to advanced system usability remain largely unknown, particularly among nurses. Little empirical research has examined sociotechnical factors, such as the work environment, that may shape the relationship between advanced EHR adoption and quality of care. Objective The objective of this study was to examine the independent and joint effects of comprehensive EHR adoption and the hospital work environment on nurse reports of EHR usability and nurse-reported quality of care and safety. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of nurse and hospital survey data. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between EHR adoption level, work environment, and a set of EHR usability and quality/safety outcomes. The sample included 12,377 nurses working in 353 hospitals. Results In fully adjusted models, comprehensive EHR adoption was associated with lower odds of nurses reporting poor usability outcomes, such as dissatisfaction with the system (odds ratio [OR]: 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61–0.92). The work environment was associated with all usability outcomes with nurses in better environments being less likely to report negatively. Comprehensive EHRs (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71–0.96) and better work environments (OR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.42–0.52) were associated with lower odds of nurses reporting fair/poor quality of care, while poor patient safety grade was associated with the work environment (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.46–0.54), but not EHR adoption level. Conclusion Our findings suggest that adoption of a comprehensive EHR is associated with more positive usability ratings and higher quality of care. We also found that—independent of EHR adoption level—the hospital work environment plays a significant role in how nurses evaluate EHR usability and whether EHRs have their intended effects on improving quality and safety of care.

Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content

“…Another study found that patients' preventive health behaviors were significantly associated with PHR use [80]. Adoption of a comprehensive EHR was found to be associated with higher quality of care [76]. In addition, the adoption of EHRs in local health departments had a positive impact on the overall health outcomes of population health (p = 0.031) [63].…”

MHealth and perceived quality of care delivery: a conceptual model and validation

“…However, in the context of performance, the association between the utilization of a technology and the PQoC (as a performance outcome) has not been investigated. It is noted [4,37] that there is scant empirical evidence of the impact which healthcare information systems have on the quality of care. Towards deriving an understanding of same, a conceptual model is developed to explore physicians' view which mHealth has on PQoC.…”

The Effect of Electronic Health Record Usability Redesign on Annual Screening Rates in an Ambulatory Setting

“…24 Poor usability of the EHR has been linked to psychological distress and negative work environment among nurses. 25,26 In an international survey, nearly one-third of respondents noted problems with system usability. 27 In the present study, addressing the usability problems and reducing the associated cognitive load not only reduced task time but also subjectively increased certainty regarding which screens were needed at each particular encounter.…”