2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2014.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Medical Records and Quality Improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first revolution relies on the massive availability of data; that is, a high amount of data can be retrieved from EHRs in real time. This aspect contrasts with former ways of collecting data, which required traditional clinical recorders [6,7].…”
Section: Some Relevant Data About Revolution Ai In Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first revolution relies on the massive availability of data; that is, a high amount of data can be retrieved from EHRs in real time. This aspect contrasts with former ways of collecting data, which required traditional clinical recorders [6,7].…”
Section: Some Relevant Data About Revolution Ai In Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies for strengthening EMRs should emphasise the usefulness of EMRs in supporting the clinical tasks of primary care workers [65]. Financial subsidies and incentive policies from governments are also important for the wide and equitable adoption of EMRs in primary care facilities [66,67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adoption of nation‐wide electronic medical record (EMR) systems should be made a matter of priority throughout the world. This technology has been shown to increase the efficiency of communication with patients and between health care providers (Joos, Chen, Jirjis, & Johnson, ), facilitate coordination by providing access to data during patient encounters (O'Malley, Grossman, Cohen, Kemper, & Pham, ), and decrease medical errors (Carter, ). These advantages are especially crucial when counseling high‐risk isolated populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%