2010
DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-1328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Medical Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of pointed questions are outlined for advice ( Fig 5 ). Diamond et al 44 also provide a nice scorecard to compare vendors. They set up a method of comparing vendors and looking at support, hardware, software, workflows, and reporting with specific criteria outlined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of pointed questions are outlined for advice ( Fig 5 ). Diamond et al 44 also provide a nice scorecard to compare vendors. They set up a method of comparing vendors and looking at support, hardware, software, workflows, and reporting with specific criteria outlined.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They set up a method of comparing vendors and looking at support, hardware, software, workflows, and reporting with specific criteria outlined. 44 Maust 35 discusses the necessary training and outlines specific questions to ask vendors. Without proper purchase and training, documentation would remain insufficient, regardless of the investment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In large part, this is because at KP (and with most current EHRs), data such as FEV 1 or 6MWT distance are currently entered as text, rather than structured fields, making them difficult or impossible to cull electronically. 47,48 Therefore, as much as providing impetus for including disease-specific measures in risk adjustment, this research also should provide motivation for health delivery organizations and EHR vendors to facilitate entering these critical data into EHRs in standardized formats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%