2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.024505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic multipoles and multiplet pairs induced by Pomeranchuk and Cooper instabilities of Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, our mean-field calculations show that, when the Bogoliubov Fermi surface carries two topological charges, the superfluid stiffness is always negative in the clean limit because the spectral weight diverges logarithmically as the temperature approaches zero in the superconducting state (because σ(ω) ∝ ω −1 at low frequencies and the spectrum is gapless.). This is consistent with other studies of inversion-breaking instabilities of Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces [45][46][47] from different perspectives. In particular, Ref.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Furthermore, our mean-field calculations show that, when the Bogoliubov Fermi surface carries two topological charges, the superfluid stiffness is always negative in the clean limit because the spectral weight diverges logarithmically as the temperature approaches zero in the superconducting state (because σ(ω) ∝ ω −1 at low frequencies and the spectrum is gapless.). This is consistent with other studies of inversion-breaking instabilities of Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces [45][46][47] from different perspectives. In particular, Ref.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…where the overline symmetrizes the expression as ABC = (ABC + ACB + BAC + BCA + CAB + CBA)/3!, for example. These operators are referred to as monopole (N ), dipole (M µ ), quadrupole (Q λ ), and octupole (T ξ ) in accordance with the number of multiplied angular momenta [26,31]. The further high-rank tensors are zero.…”
Section: Appendix A: Complete Basis Set With Spin-orbit Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we restrict ourselves to the j eff = 3/2 diagonal subspace, the matrices are the same as those used in Ref. [31].…”
Section: Appendix A: Complete Basis Set With Spin-orbit Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further experimental signatures of BFSs [6] and their instability against spontaneous breaking of inversion symmetry either electronically [7][8][9] or by lattice distortions [10] have been considered by several groups. BFSs can be protected by multiple topological invariants [2,11], which imposes constraints on how they can merge and gap out for strong coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%