1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-4005(98)00242-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic nose and sensorial analysis: comparison of performances in selected cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Commercially available electronic noses use an array of sensors combined with pattern recognition software. There have been several reports on electronic sensing in the food industry (Keller, Kangas, Liden, Hashem, & Kouzes, 1995;Schaller, Bosset, & Escher, 1998 authors reported positive applications of electronic nose technology to the discrimination of fruits of different quality or ripeness, such as: oranges (Brezmes et al, 2001); tomatoes (Brezmes, Llobet, Vilanova, Saiz, & Correig, 2000); apples (Di Natale et al, 2001;Di Natale et al, 1998;Magan & Evans, 2000;Saevels et al, 2003); grain (Young, Rossiter, Wang, & Miller, 1999), but still few literatures are referred to monitoring of fruit shelf life and quality attribute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commercially available electronic noses use an array of sensors combined with pattern recognition software. There have been several reports on electronic sensing in the food industry (Keller, Kangas, Liden, Hashem, & Kouzes, 1995;Schaller, Bosset, & Escher, 1998 authors reported positive applications of electronic nose technology to the discrimination of fruits of different quality or ripeness, such as: oranges (Brezmes et al, 2001); tomatoes (Brezmes, Llobet, Vilanova, Saiz, & Correig, 2000); apples (Di Natale et al, 2001;Di Natale et al, 1998;Magan & Evans, 2000;Saevels et al, 2003); grain (Young, Rossiter, Wang, & Miller, 1999), but still few literatures are referred to monitoring of fruit shelf life and quality attribute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of e-nose is typically used for the objective detection of odors in foodstuff and other items of forensic importance (20)(21)(22)(23). The e-nose, for example, is able to qualitatively distinguish between different kinds of olive oils (24), different brands of coffee (25), and different beers (26), and also can distinguish the smell of car interiors (27).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such device is usually characterised by reproducibility and reliability, as it has a short reaction and recovery time. Although the instrument does not allow the actual identification of compounds and has a higher detection limit against GC-MS, it has been successfully used in processing monitoring, shelf-life investigation, freshness evaluation and authenticity assessment in a wide range of food products (Di Natale, et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%