2016
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201600255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic properties of CVD graphene: The role of grain boundaries, atmospheric doping, and encapsulation by ALD

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Grain boundaries and unintentional doping can have profound effects on graphene-based devices. Here we study these in detail for CVD grown poly-crystalline monolayer graphene with two significantly different grain size distributions centered around 10-25 mm and 100-400 mm. Although the two types of graphene are p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is significantly higher than for the wet-transferred samples, which only show 1570 cm V –1 s –1 for large grain size and 461 cm V –1 s –1 for standard grain size graphene. In the case of wet transfer, we suggest that acid induced polymer cross-linking 16,43 and preferential residue accumulation along the grain boundaries 4446 are the main contributors to the diminished performance. In particular, the case of cross-linking is avoided in the LOT-I process, as the samples are only in contact with a NaOH solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This result is significantly higher than for the wet-transferred samples, which only show 1570 cm V –1 s –1 for large grain size and 461 cm V –1 s –1 for standard grain size graphene. In the case of wet transfer, we suggest that acid induced polymer cross-linking 16,43 and preferential residue accumulation along the grain boundaries 4446 are the main contributors to the diminished performance. In particular, the case of cross-linking is avoided in the LOT-I process, as the samples are only in contact with a NaOH solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Each square has an area = 9 µm 2 shorting the gap between the antennas' arms. A final conformal di electric layer of 80 nm of Al 2 O 3 was then deposited on top of the sample via atomic layer deposition (ALD) in stop-flow mode using H 2 O/ TMA precursors, thus encapsulating the graphene [19,20]. This last step is crucial in order to reduce the hysteresis [21] and bring the Dirac point to bias voltages lower than 100-120 V which was observed in previous strongly p-doped samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is easy to complete the deposition of a graphene monolayer onto a metal substrate, and the progress of this approach demonstrates the great potential of large-area single crystals [25,[46][47][48]. Growth techniques reported in the literature can be observed in Table 1, including chemical vapor deposition (CVD), atomic layer deposition (ALD), nucleation and growth, liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE), electrochemical exfoliation, and a solution process [6,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58]. Apart from graphene-based materials, some researchers like Zhang et al also focused on other 2D materials such as MoS 2 -based composites, which presented excellent performance in the application of memristive devices, similar to that using graphene-based materials [58].…”
Section: Synthesis Technologies Of Graphene-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1. Comparison among main synthesis technologies and applications for graphene and its derivatives [6,[49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Synthesis Technologies Of Graphene-based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%