2002
DOI: 10.21225/d5qk5c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Publishing, Scholarly Communication, and the Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education

Abstract: Although in some parts of the academic community the popularity of electronic journals allows research to be conducted almost exclusively online, the social sciences, of which education is a part, have generally been slower to accept the electronic publishing (e-publishing) of journals and research data. Using a nationally distributed questionnaire, the readership of the Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education was asked to provide input on this topic. The discussion paper that follows presents the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Forum piece, "Electronic Publishing, Scholarly Communication, and the Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education" (Conrad, 2002), began by outlining the debate over electronic publishing. Although it is hard to imagine, this debate began well over a decade ago.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Forum piece, "Electronic Publishing, Scholarly Communication, and the Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education" (Conrad, 2002), began by outlining the debate over electronic publishing. Although it is hard to imagine, this debate began well over a decade ago.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…resources, and skills for accessing electronic information and communication. Thus, before making a decision to move a journal to an electronic presence, it is important to investigate the views of a discipline's social practices, as was done by the editor of CJUCE (Conrad, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations