Electronic Reserves, Copyright, and CMS Integration–Six Years Later

Poe, Jodi; McAbee, Sonja L.

doi:10.1080/15367960802198879

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Drew (2007), Oliver (2008), and Poe (2007) are among a growing number of librarians looking specifically at the connection between e-reserves and course management systems.…”

Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Reserves in Transition: Exploring New Possibilities in E-Reserves Service Delivery

Goodson

Frederiksen

2011

Journal of Interlibrary Loan,Document Delivery & Electronic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nearly all academic libraries offer course reserves and most have long considered it a core library service. However, expanding use of course management systems in academia have opened new opportunities for libraries interested in exploring changes to electronic reserves services. Budget constraints and staffing shortages have also led several institutions to consider eliminating or modifying their e-reserves operations. Potentially difficult challenges, however, also accompany making significant changes to often well-established practices.This environmental scan of selected academic libraries across the United States discusses institutions which have maintained the status quo in e-reserves services, as well as those who have changed or discontinued these services. The article also provides insight on why some of the latter decided to make these changes.

show abstract

“…Drew (2007), Oliver (2008), and Poe (2007) are among a growing number of librarians looking specifically at the connection between e-reserves and course management systems.…”

Section: Literature Review and Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

E-Reserves in Transition: Exploring New Possibilities in E-Reserves Service Delivery

Goodson

Frederiksen

2011

Journal of Interlibrary Loan,Document Delivery & Electronic

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ugly... Without ultimate institutional control over the source code that runs the program (a particular concern for institutions using commercial packages, such as Blackboard), pedagogical content may no longer be in the hands of individual academics, or indeed academic institutions, but may technically be the property of the program developer or commercial company 48 . This continuing corporatization of academic knowledge, if left unchecked, may lead to a loss of identity or indeed academic freedom 49 , with institutions becoming homogenized franchises as opposed to independent seats of learning.…”

Section: Wwwscienceprogresscoukmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Evolution of Elearning Background, Blends and Blackboard …

Sleator¹

2010

Science Progress

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review of eLearning is divided into three sections: the first charts the evolution of eLearning from early correspondence courses to the current computer mediated approaches to distributed learning. The second section deals with the concept of blended learning; combining best practice in face-toface and online learning. The final section focuses on current platform technologies in eLearning and outlines the strengths and weaknesses of learning management systems such as Blackboard.

show abstract

References

2010

New Approaches to E-Reserve

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Electronic Reserves, Copyright, and CMS Integration–Six Years Later

Cited by 6 publications

References 5 publications

E-Reserves in Transition: Exploring New Possibilities in E-Reserves Service Delivery

E-Reserves in Transition: Exploring New Possibilities in E-Reserves Service Delivery

The Evolution of Elearning Background, Blends and Blackboard …

References

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About