2014
DOI: 10.3103/s0147688214010109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic scientific journal-management systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, despite its widespread use as an online learning platform, Moodle has limitations for learning scientific writing or developing dissertation proposals. These limitations include the lack of peer review and dialogic feedback features (Fernando, 2020), as well as the inability to record results of reviews and feedback (Elizarov, Zuev and Lipachev, 2014). Based on this issue, the author suggests a novel approach by examining the potential of Open Journal Systems (OJS) as an alternative online learning platform in addition to Moodle, which was formerly exclusively a content management and editorial process for scholarly journals (Herdianto et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, despite its widespread use as an online learning platform, Moodle has limitations for learning scientific writing or developing dissertation proposals. These limitations include the lack of peer review and dialogic feedback features (Fernando, 2020), as well as the inability to record results of reviews and feedback (Elizarov, Zuev and Lipachev, 2014). Based on this issue, the author suggests a novel approach by examining the potential of Open Journal Systems (OJS) as an alternative online learning platform in addition to Moodle, which was formerly exclusively a content management and editorial process for scholarly journals (Herdianto et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%