Characterization of Solid Materials and Heterogeneous Catalysts 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9783527645329.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Spectroscopy: Ultra Violet‐Visible and near IR Spectroscopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all these techniques are used during catalyst characterization due to the specificity and nature of sample environment of each, but usually, a number of the techniques are combined to gather as much data to support the characterization. However, most of these characterization techniques are typically not conducted under true reaction conditions, and some of the techniques are even the subject of debate concerning the information obtained and whether it can be transferred to real life catalysts under real working conditions. , …”
Section: Traditional Approaches To Catalyst Kinetic and Physical Char...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all these techniques are used during catalyst characterization due to the specificity and nature of sample environment of each, but usually, a number of the techniques are combined to gather as much data to support the characterization. However, most of these characterization techniques are typically not conducted under true reaction conditions, and some of the techniques are even the subject of debate concerning the information obtained and whether it can be transferred to real life catalysts under real working conditions. , …”
Section: Traditional Approaches To Catalyst Kinetic and Physical Char...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tauc plot was derived from the UV/Vis diffuse reflectance spectrum of a ZnMnO 3 /ZnO composite film (photodeposition time: 45 min) and highlights a linear region between 3.1 and 3.4 eV (Figure 5b ). The x‐intercept of a corresponding linear fit[ 34 , 35 ] yields a band gap E BG ~2.5 eV ( λ ~496 nm) in good accordance with the band gap of crystalline ZnMnO 3 nanosheets. In addition, a second contribution at lower energies i. e. at E >2.1 eV can be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%