1995
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.52.1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic spectrum ofS2, the electron affinity ofS

Abstract: The low-lying electronic states of the S& anion have been investigated by quantum-chemica1 methods incorporating an extensive treatment of electron correlation. All excited doublet states that can be reached in spin-and dipole-allowed transitions from the IIg ground state of the anionic disulfur molecule as we11 as the lowest quartet state X"arecharacterized by their spectroscopic constants, excitation energies, and transition dipole matrix elements with the ground state. Furthermore, an accurate calibration o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement for the neutral spectroscopic parameters and with previous works for S 2 − makes possible reliable predictions for the unknown anionic states. Indeed, for S 2 (X 3 g − ) our MRCI + Q internuclear distance of 1.898Å differs by less than 0.01Å from both the experimental (1.889Å [26]) and earlier MRCI + Q (1.907Å [14]) values, and the harmonic wavenumber (716.8 cm −1 ) compares rather well with the values (725.65 cm −1 and 734 cm −1 ) given in [26] and [14], respectively. For S 2 − (X 2 g ), there is also a good agreement between our R e value (2.021Å) and previous experimental (2.005 ± 0.015Å [5]) and theoretical (2.018Å [14]) determinations.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculations: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The agreement for the neutral spectroscopic parameters and with previous works for S 2 − makes possible reliable predictions for the unknown anionic states. Indeed, for S 2 (X 3 g − ) our MRCI + Q internuclear distance of 1.898Å differs by less than 0.01Å from both the experimental (1.889Å [26]) and earlier MRCI + Q (1.907Å [14]) values, and the harmonic wavenumber (716.8 cm −1 ) compares rather well with the values (725.65 cm −1 and 734 cm −1 ) given in [26] and [14], respectively. For S 2 − (X 2 g ), there is also a good agreement between our R e value (2.021Å) and previous experimental (2.005 ± 0.015Å [5]) and theoretical (2.018Å [14]) determinations.…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculations: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Indeed, for S 2 (X 3 g − ) our MRCI + Q internuclear distance of 1.898Å differs by less than 0.01Å from both the experimental (1.889Å [26]) and earlier MRCI + Q (1.907Å [14]) values, and the harmonic wavenumber (716.8 cm −1 ) compares rather well with the values (725.65 cm −1 and 734 cm −1 ) given in [26] and [14], respectively. For S 2 − (X 2 g ), there is also a good agreement between our R e value (2.021Å) and previous experimental (2.005 ± 0.015Å [5]) and theoretical (2.018Å [14]) determinations. The harmonic wavenumber ω e = 555.5 cm −1 for S 2 − (X 2 g ) is within photoelectron spectroscopy error bars (570 ± 100 cm −1 [5]) and in close accord with the value of 584 cm −1 derived from studies of S 2 − trapped in silicate solid matrices [23].…”
Section: Electronic Structure Calculations: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, we will ignore both quantum effects (except for those related with the reactant triatomic molecule whose initial state is mimicked as closely as possible) and nonadiabaticity. Given the large masses of the reactant species and the fact that the ground ( 3 P ) and first-excited ( 1 D) electronic states are separated by more than 25 kcal mol −1 [9], we can hardly judge such effects to have any crucial role for the rate constant calculations carried out in the present work. The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%