“…The difference in the behavior of the CT states of 198 (allowed emission) and 111 (forbidden transition), their excitonic states being of similar nature, seems to be in the symmetry restrictions in the state mixing that is operative for 111 . In view of the nonplanarity of numerous polycyclic arenes, among them perylene, − in 198 (C 1 ) there seems to be no symmetry restrictions at all. With respect to the ground-state conformation, 111 , with its very strong steric interaction of the two aryl systems, has an orthogonal conformation in S 0 ; 198 has a much weaker steric hindrance, like that of 1,1‘-binaphthyl.…”