2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.80.235108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure and chemical bonding of nanocrystalline-TiC/amorphous-C nanocomposites

Abstract: The electronic structure of nanocrystalline ͑nc-͒ TiC/amorphous C nanocomposites has been investigated by soft x-ray absorption and emission spectroscopy. The measured spectra at the Ti 2p and C 1s thresholds of the nanocomposites are compared to those of Ti metal and amorphous C. The corresponding intensities of the electronic states for the valence and conduction bands in the nanocomposites are shown to strongly depend on the TiC carbide grain size. An increased charge transfer between the Ti 3d-e g states a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
83
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
19
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Between these contributions C-Si bonds, at 282.5 eV, are expected. For nanocomposite Ti-C materials additional contributions have also been reported in this region [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], which have been associated with several different causes, including ion beam sputtering damage [42], and an interfacial state between nc-TiC and a-C phase [12,40,41,43]. Such contribution can hence not be excluded in the present samples, and is indicated in Figure 4 by TiC*.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Target-to-substrate Distance And Pressurementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Between these contributions C-Si bonds, at 282.5 eV, are expected. For nanocomposite Ti-C materials additional contributions have also been reported in this region [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44], which have been associated with several different causes, including ion beam sputtering damage [42], and an interfacial state between nc-TiC and a-C phase [12,40,41,43]. Such contribution can hence not be excluded in the present samples, and is indicated in Figure 4 by TiC*.…”
Section: The Influence Of the Target-to-substrate Distance And Pressurementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Fitting of the C1s spectrum shows that the contribution to the peak at 282.4 eV, denoted C-Si, is not only from C-Si bonds, but probably also from sputtering damage and an interfacial state. The latter has been observed in nanocomposite TiC coatings and is known as TiC* [29,30,31]. (002) planes (see HREM and FFT insets in Figure 5a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limited solid solubility can be explained by considering the density-of-states (DOS) for cubic Ti-C [24,25]. With Ti all bonding states are occupied giving a Fermi level just below the nonbonding/antibonding states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%