Magnetism: Molecules to Materials II 2001
DOI: 10.1002/3527600590.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure and Magnetic Behavior in Polynuclear Transition‐Metal Compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1d ) also suggesting a valence localisation of the spins. The magnetic coupling of the complex 1 for a high spin ( S = 2 and S = 5/2) is computed using the ground state structure employing the standard protocol, 145 and this gives a J value of –137.3 cm –1 , and this matches well with the experimental estimate of –90 ± 20 cm –1 reported using EPR studies 73 offering confidence in the estimated structures and properties. Here, we have computed the overlap integral between two SOMOs of the Fe centres 108 and a significant overlap is noted between the SOMOs of d yz and d xz orbitals of Fe III and Fe IV centres, respectively, and this strong overlap is found to be responsible for the strong antiferromagnetic coupling observed (see Tables S6 and S7 in the ESI † ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…1d ) also suggesting a valence localisation of the spins. The magnetic coupling of the complex 1 for a high spin ( S = 2 and S = 5/2) is computed using the ground state structure employing the standard protocol, 145 and this gives a J value of –137.3 cm –1 , and this matches well with the experimental estimate of –90 ± 20 cm –1 reported using EPR studies 73 offering confidence in the estimated structures and properties. Here, we have computed the overlap integral between two SOMOs of the Fe centres 108 and a significant overlap is noted between the SOMOs of d yz and d xz orbitals of Fe III and Fe IV centres, respectively, and this strong overlap is found to be responsible for the strong antiferromagnetic coupling observed (see Tables S6 and S7 in the ESI † ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Calculations were performed on complexes 1 and 6 derived from experimental crystallographic geometries. The approach used to determine the exchange coupling constants for polynuclear complexes has been described in detail elsewhere [65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations based on Density Functional Theory provide an excellent estimation of the exchange coupling constants in polynuclear transition metal complexes despite the very small energy differences involved. 26,27 Detailed description of the computational procedure employed to calculate the exchange coupling constants in polynuclear complexes has been previously provided by some of us. 28,29 The calculations were performed using Gaussian16 B.01 version 30 with the B3LYP functional 31 and an all electron basis set (Def2TZV).…”
Section: Theoretical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%