2013
DOI: 10.2138/am.2013.4329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure effects in the vectorial bond-valence model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his description of a recent expansion of the BVM called the core-and-valence-shell model, Brown (2011) posited spherically symmetrical atoms in which weaker bonds tend to allow the symmetrical distribution of bonding and non-bonding (lone-pair) valence electron density, whereas strong bonds tend to make the lone pairs stereoactive, concentrating the lone-pair density to one side of the atom. Bickmore et al (2013) and quantified the resulting distortions in the coordination sphere, showing that if bonds are represented as vectors in the direction from cation to anion and magnitude equal to the bond valence, the valence dipole moment (i.e., the vectorial valence sum) and the valence quadrupole moment are predictable functions of the expected types of electronic structure effects and the magnitude of the incident bond valence. Clearly, small departures from the traditional ionic framework of the BVM can yield large dividends in terms of the ability to model the total structure of a much larger class of compounds.…”
Section: Bond Valence and Covalent Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In his description of a recent expansion of the BVM called the core-and-valence-shell model, Brown (2011) posited spherically symmetrical atoms in which weaker bonds tend to allow the symmetrical distribution of bonding and non-bonding (lone-pair) valence electron density, whereas strong bonds tend to make the lone pairs stereoactive, concentrating the lone-pair density to one side of the atom. Bickmore et al (2013) and quantified the resulting distortions in the coordination sphere, showing that if bonds are represented as vectors in the direction from cation to anion and magnitude equal to the bond valence, the valence dipole moment (i.e., the vectorial valence sum) and the valence quadrupole moment are predictable functions of the expected types of electronic structure effects and the magnitude of the incident bond valence. Clearly, small departures from the traditional ionic framework of the BVM can yield large dividends in terms of the ability to model the total structure of a much larger class of compounds.…”
Section: Bond Valence and Covalent Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such ad hoc adjustments, like dimerization, come with a cost, because they make it difficult or impossible to apply the recent extensions of the BVM that account for bond directionality (Brown 2011;Bickmore et al 2013). Bonded pairs still take up space on the surface of an atom, whether the BVM acknowledges their existence, or not.…”
Section: Bond Valence and Covalent Bondingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vector valence sum of an atom is closely related to the slope of the valence map at the location of the atom, a zero sum indicating a minimum in the valence map. A recent study by Bickmore et al [69] shows that in cases where the bonds are not uniformly distributed, e.g., when the central atom has a stereoactive lone pair [78 section 7.1], the valence vector sum provides a convenient measure of the deviation of the atomic environment from centrosymmetric symmetry.…”
Section: The Origin and Development Of The Bond Valence Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the scalar bond valence is also vectorized to describe the geometry of crystal structures [13,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%