2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure Investigation of the Bulk Properties of Uranium–Plutonium Mixed Oxides (U, Pu)O2

Abstract: We present electronic structure calculations of bulk properties of (U, Pu)O, in the whole Pu content range for which only very few experimental data are available. We use DFT+U and the vdW-DF functional in order to take into account the strong 5f electron correlations and nonlocal correlations. We investigate structural, elastic, electronic, and energetic properties of (U, Pu)O in the approximation of the ideal solid solution as described by the special quasirandom structures (SQS) method. The results on elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Method evolution of the U value does not have a significant influence on the band gap. Concerning the bulk modulus, our calculated values, 135 GPa for C-type and 139 GPa for B-type, follow the same trend as the ones obtained in Pu 2 O 3 (137-164 GPa) using DFT+U [17]. Concerning the A-type structure the bulk modulus remains the same when U varies.…”
Section: Compsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Method evolution of the U value does not have a significant influence on the band gap. Concerning the bulk modulus, our calculated values, 135 GPa for C-type and 139 GPa for B-type, follow the same trend as the ones obtained in Pu 2 O 3 (137-164 GPa) using DFT+U [17]. Concerning the A-type structure the bulk modulus remains the same when U varies.…”
Section: Compsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Whereas the onsite Coulomb interaction U and exchange J are well known for UO 2 [11,12], this is not the case for americium oxides, for which literature does not agree on any value since these values strongly vary from one author to another [7,[13][14][15]. Actinide oxides have been extensively studied by the DFT+U [12,[16][17][18] method. Thus, we use the DFT+U method in this paper and we purpose to provide the optimal values of the U and J parameters for americium oxides, which will be used in a subsequent study to evaluate the effect of americium in mixed actinide oxides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being aware of the well-known deficiencies of conventional pure DFT [59] in describing strongly correlated systems, we chose the hybrid PBE0, HSE06 and the pure PBE functionals, respectively. In the latter approximation, the Hubbard correction term has been also employed [60][61][62][63][64]. In all cases, we applied the spin-polarized generalized gradient approximation (SGGA ?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a further step, we calculated the magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE) of YSZ 6.7 mol% in Er 2 O 3 defined as the difference between the total energies of a magnetic material for different orientations of the magnetization. For that purpose, we used the SGGA method including spin-orbit coupling (SOC) [62] taking also into account the Hubbard term (U) [63].…”
Section: Magnetic Properties Of Er 13 :Yszmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the stability of alloyed compounds, the free enthalpy of mixing is usually considered [4,5,32]. The Gibbs free energy of mixing refers to the energy difference of a configurationally random alloy where the atomic species randomly occupy lattice positions [33] with respect to the pure compounds.…”
Section: Energetic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%