2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3684608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure, lattice energies and Born exponents for alkali halides from first principles

Abstract: First principles calculations based on DFT have been performed on crystals of halides (X = F, Cl, Br and I) of alkali metals (M = Li, Na, K, Rb and Cs). The calculated lattice energies (U0) are in good agreement with the experimental lattice enthalpies. A new exact formalism is proposed to determine the Born exponent (n) for ionic solids. The values of the Born exponent calculated through this ab-initio technique is in good agreement with previous empirically derived results. Band Structure calculations reveal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that in all cases, the minimum energy gap is direct at the Γ point as found from the EV approximation; whereas earlier DFT calculations exhibit the well‐known severe underestimation of energy gaps. Furthermore the qualitative features in these band structures are found to be very similar.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note that in all cases, the minimum energy gap is direct at the Γ point as found from the EV approximation; whereas earlier DFT calculations exhibit the well‐known severe underestimation of energy gaps. Furthermore the qualitative features in these band structures are found to be very similar.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…However the density functional theory (DFT) [2] calculations within the local density approximation (LDA) [3] or generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [4] give rise to a typical underestimation of electronic excitation energies, such as energy gaps. For instance, the calculated [5][6] lowest band gaps are severely underestimated compared to experiment. This is the case of calculated LDA band gaps [5] of 7.26, 6.38, 5.84, and 4.37 eV for NaF, NaCl, NaBr, and NaI, respectively, compared to the measured values [7] of 11.5, 8.75, 7.1, and 5.9 eV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The PBE energy gap computed using the polarisation-optimised basis set 3 (9.15 eV) is in good agreement with recent calculations based on the projector augmented wave (PAW) approach (8.94 eV) 62 . We find the B3LYP energy gap to be at least 2 eV smaller than the band gap, which is unusual, considering the well known ability of B3LYP to approximate, typically very accurately, band gaps of semiconductors and some classes of wide-gap insulators, e.g.…”
Section: 45supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Besides melting points, other properties were evaluated for alkali halides using first principle calculations. Gopikrishnan et al 20 calculated lattice energies of alkali halides with an RMSD of E70 kJ mol À1 that, in fact, can be predicted more accurately by our polarizable model using classical MD simulations (RMSD 16 kJ mol À1 ) and other force fields. 6 On the other hand, first principle calculations offer the possibility to calculate properties such as the band-structures of materials that cannot be obtained with classical simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…6 On the other hand, first principle calculations offer the possibility to calculate properties such as the band-structures of materials that cannot be obtained with classical simulations. 20 However, quantum chemistry methods remain severely limited by computational demands and nanosecond simulations for systems of thousands of particles are still firmly out of reach for first principles MD simulations. Therefore, accurate classical MD simulations remain the most practical route to study properties such as melting points of complex systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%