2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.73.245429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of an orderedPbAg(111)surface alloy: Theory and experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
105
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
15
105
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface state dispersions follow basically a Ý3 × Ý3 SBZ periodicity, and the general shapes are close to those of the corresponding bands reported for other group-IV-induced surface alloys on Ag(111), i.e. Pb/Ag(111)(Ý3 × Ý3) [11] and Sn/Ag(111)(Ý3 × Ý3) [3]. Close to¯ , there are two steeply dispersing surface bands labeled S 1 and S 2 .…”
Section: B Electronic Band Structurementioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface state dispersions follow basically a Ý3 × Ý3 SBZ periodicity, and the general shapes are close to those of the corresponding bands reported for other group-IV-induced surface alloys on Ag(111), i.e. Pb/Ag(111)(Ý3 × Ý3) [11] and Sn/Ag(111)(Ý3 × Ý3) [3]. Close to¯ , there are two steeply dispersing surface bands labeled S 1 and S 2 .…”
Section: B Electronic Band Structurementioning
confidence: 49%
“…However, as reported in that study, the Ge/Ag surface alloy shows an unexpected surface band split at theM points along the¯ KM line of the Ý3 × Ý3 surface Brillouin zone (SBZ). The observation of split bands at theM points clearly indicates that the Ge/Ag alloy differs substantially from the other group IV alloys (Pb/Ag [11] and Sn/Ag [3]; as well as from the alloys induced by Bi [2] or Sb [12]). As was concluded in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While actual devices are currently realized in semiconductor heterostructures [4], fundamental issues can be more easily studied in two-dimensional metallic systems involving heavy metal atoms, where spin splittings are much larger [5,6]. Very recently, a new class of material systems was identified where this effect is even further enhanced, among them the two surface alloys Bi/Ag(111)( √ 3 × √ 3)R30 • and Pb/Ag(111)( √ 3 × √ 3)R30 • [7,8], referred to as Bi/Ag(111) and Pb/Ag(111) henceforth. Due to an additional reduction of the surface symmetry caused by the ( √ 3 × √ 3)R30 • surface reconstruction and due to a slight corrugation of the surface [9], the size of the Rashba type spin-orbit induced spin splitting is about one order of magnitude larger than what is observed for the Au(111) surface state [10,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…∆ so ≃ 110 meV in Au(111), 7 that the possibility of detecting SO split image states has been recently put forward. 10 Other systems displaying giant SO splittings are surface alloys as, for example, Li/W(110), 11 Pb/Ag(111), 12,13 and Bi/Ag(111), 14 or even one-dimensional structures such as Au chains in vicinal Si(111) surfaces. 15 For such low-dimensional or structured materials, the SO interaction is of Rashba type, but large SO splittings have been found (or predicted) also in bulk crystals, where the Dresselhaus interaction leads to ∆ so as large as 200 meV in non-centrosymmetric superconductors CePt 3 Si, 16,17 Li 2 Pd 3 B, and Li 2 P7 3 B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%