1975
DOI: 10.1021/ja00858a002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure of dicarbonyls. Ground state of glyoxal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are summarized in the Supporting Information. The computational results find the known stable structures for the cis and trans isomers of the neutral glyoxal, with the trans structure more stable, consistent with previous work [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The energy difference between the two conformers is calculated to be 1625 cm -1 (including only the torsional zero point energy).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results are summarized in the Supporting Information. The computational results find the known stable structures for the cis and trans isomers of the neutral glyoxal, with the trans structure more stable, consistent with previous work [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The energy difference between the two conformers is calculated to be 1625 cm -1 (including only the torsional zero point energy).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Bulat et al showed that the greatest contribution to the isomerization barrier in the neutral is such a through-bond interaction [13]. Ionization of glyoxal removes one electron from the HOMO, which corresponds to the non-bonding lone pairs on oxygen, producing a 2 A g ground state, but theory has shown that this orbital is close in energy and mixed in character with the highest π orbital [8]. Ionization here apparently disrupts the π system and destabilizes the cis conformer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Experimental studies of glyoxal [l, 21, biacetyl [3], and various oxalyl halides [4-61 show a clear preference for the trans, planar configuration as the most stable configuration, with glyoxal and oxalyl fluoride possessing a less stable cis configuration, oxalyl chloride a less stable gauche conformation, and biacetyl showing no evidence of any other configuration. Ab initio calculations have also been carried out on glyoxal [7], the oxalyl halides [8], and biacetyl [9]; these are all at least qualitatively supportive of the experimental conclusions. These ab initio based internal rotation potentials have generally been analyzed irr terms of a two-or three-term Fourier expansion.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Many theoretical works have also been performed to investigate the electronic spectra of these molecules. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Ab initio methods such as the symmetry adapted cluster configuration interaction ͑SAC-CI͒, 16 complete active space perturbation theory to second order ͑CASPT2͒, 21,22 multireference Moller-Plesset ͑MRMP͒, 23 and multireference configuration interaction 24,25 ͑MRCI͒ were utilized to calculate the vertical excitation energies of these molecules. In the recent years, the low-lying excited states of trans-1,3-butadiene were intensively examined, in particular, the 2 1 A g and 1 1 B u excited states by MRCI with singles and doubles ͑MR-CISD͒ and multireference averaged quadratic coupled cluster ͑MR-AQCC͒ methods 30 and the 2 1 A g excited state by using a variety of ab initio methods, complete active space selfconsistent field ͑CASSCF͒, CASPT2, multireference singles and doubles configuration interaction ͑MRSDCI͒, and quasidegenerate variational perturbation theory ͑QDVPT͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%