1988
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.38.11322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic structure ofCu2O and CuO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

117
704
9
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,574 publications
(856 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
117
704
9
4
Order By: Relevance
“…3(c). The lattice constants of the cubic crystal evaluated from the XRD data of this sample are estimated as 6 a = b = c = 4.27Å, in good agreement with previous data [2]. The thickness of the Cu 2 O film obtained after the oxidation process was about 400 nm which is nearly two times as thick as that of the Cu precursor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3(c). The lattice constants of the cubic crystal evaluated from the XRD data of this sample are estimated as 6 a = b = c = 4.27Å, in good agreement with previous data [2]. The thickness of the Cu 2 O film obtained after the oxidation process was about 400 nm which is nearly two times as thick as that of the Cu precursor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It was clarified that the composition of the sample was homogenous throughout the entire depth of the film. We have confirmed that the sample consists of a pure cuprite phase because there is neither chemical shift nor structural difference of the O 1s peak at 530.4 eV and the Cu 2p 3/2 peak at 932.4 eV due to the impurity phases such as CuO and Cu(OH) 2 in the whole film [2,26]. A broad shoulder around 532.4 eV of the O 1s spectrum, which could be assigned as the Si-O bond of the SLG substrate, was observed at the back side of the film.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These discrepancies can be taken as a first evidence for the presence of electron correlation effects in the open Cu 3d shell. 23,31 As a next step, we compare the results from the GGA+U calculations with the experimental valence band spectrum. Figure 4 (c) reveals that the intensity of feature B in the simulation is now much too small, and that, by contrast, the 8 eV peak in the Cu 3d from the simulation is absent in the experiment.…”
Section: Results B: Valence and Conduction Bandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value of U was determined by obtaining the position of the polaron state relative to the VB in Li-doped MgO [43], but can also be found from experimental data [69]. Since U has no effect on the conduction band states, which derive from Ti 3d orbtials, then DFT+U, as used here, cannot give the correct band gap and hence the correct offset of the defect state to the conduction band.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%