1982
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.2221130228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Structure of Molybdenum Dioxide Calculated by the Xα Method

Abstract: The discrete variational-Xcr method employing a [Mo,~,,,]~~-cluster is applied to electronic-structure and density of states calculations of rutile family MOO,. Level profiles obtained are generally in good agreement with the optical conductivity data and observations by photoelectron spectroscopy. The splitting of the Mo 4d predominant levels just below the EF level is attributed to the formation of a partially filledMo-O(x*) type band which is lower in the binding energy by % 0.7 eV than the completely fille… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The valence spectrum closely resembles that of MoO 2 , 25,26 which is known to be a metallic oxide, with a resistivity of 8.8ϫ 10 −5 ⍀ cm. 27 The spectrum has a peak centered at 1.6 eV, attributed to O 2p states, 26 and a broad feature crossing the Fermi level attributed to Mo 4d states. 26 The work functions of the three substrates were determined from the photoemission secondary-electron cut-off, as shown in the top panel of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The valence spectrum closely resembles that of MoO 2 , 25,26 which is known to be a metallic oxide, with a resistivity of 8.8ϫ 10 −5 ⍀ cm. 27 The spectrum has a peak centered at 1.6 eV, attributed to O 2p states, 26 and a broad feature crossing the Fermi level attributed to Mo 4d states. 26 The work functions of the three substrates were determined from the photoemission secondary-electron cut-off, as shown in the top panel of Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…24 In contrast to stoichiometric MoO 3 , the valence spectrum of the reduced oxide shows occupied states extending up to the Fermi level, implying the material has no band gap ͑i.e., metallic character͒. The valence spectrum closely resembles that of MoO 2 , 25,26 which is known to be a metallic oxide, with a resistivity of 8.8ϫ 10 −5 ⍀ cm. 27 The spectrum has a peak centered at 1.6 eV, attributed to O 2p states, 26 and a broad feature crossing the Fermi level attributed to Mo 4d states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The aforementioned experimental studies reveal the presence of +4 oxidation states of Mo (in addition to Mo 6+ ions) on the surface of molybdenum dioxide and exhibit a formation of an additional near-Fermi sub-band on the XPS valence-band spectra when going from MoO 3 to MoO 2 . Electronic properties of molybdenum dioxide in a hypothetical high-symmetry rutile-like structure were calculated by the discrete variational-X␣ (DV-X␣) method [38,39], while Eyert et al [40] have made band-structure calculations of monoclinic MoO 2 based on density functional theory within the local density approximation and using the augmented spherical wave (DFT-LDA-ASW) method. Due to results of the DFT-LDA-ASW calculations [40], the valence band of MoO 2 is dominated by strong hybridization of the O 2p and crystal-field-split Mo 4d states, and the near-Fermi sub-band of the compound originates almost exclusively from Mo 4d(t 2g ) orbitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] In addition, some theoretical studies, at different levels of theory, have confirmed the structural results of the experiments, showing enhanced stability of the rutile phase for most metal dioxides. [20][21][22][23] Rutile oxides are interesting in connection with electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting, [24][25][26][27] and recently the surface redox processes on, e.g., RuO 2 and TiO 2 have been treated using density functional theory ͑DFT͒. 28,29 The question remains whether standard DFT-generalized gradient approximation ͑GGA͒ ͑Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%